Core Viewpoint - DeFi Technologies is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged securities fraud that has negatively impacted investors between May 12, 2025, and November 14, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that DeFi Technologies made false statements regarding delays in executing its DeFi arbitrage strategy, which is a key revenue driver for the company [2]. - It is alleged that the company understated the competition it faced from other digital asset treasury companies, which affected its ability to execute its DeFi arbitrage strategy [2]. - As a result of these issues, DeFi Technologies is unlikely to meet its previously issued revenue guidance for the fiscal year 2025 [2]. - The defendants are accused of downplaying the true scope and severity of the negative impacts on the company's business and financial results [2]. - Public statements made by the defendants are claimed to be materially false and misleading throughout the relevant period [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses in DeFi Technologies during the relevant timeframe have until January 30, 2026, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, and participation does not require serving as a lead plaintiff [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has extensive expertise in complex securities litigation [4]. - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

Core Viewpoint - DeFi Technologies (NASDAQ: DEFT) is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and financial performance during the class period from May 12, 2025, to November 14, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Allegations - The complaint alleges that DeFi Technologies faced delays in executing its DeFi arbitrage strategy, which was a key revenue driver for the company [1]. - It is claimed that DeFi Technologies understated the competition it faced from other digital asset treasury companies, impacting its ability to execute its DeFi arbitrage strategy [1]. - The company is unlikely to meet its previously issued revenue guidance for the fiscal year 2025 due to the aforementioned issues [1]. - Defendants allegedly downplayed the true scope and severity of the negative impacts on DeFi Technologies' business and financial results [1]. - Public statements made by the defendants were materially false and misleading throughout the class period [1]. Group 2: Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased shares of DEFT during the specified timeframe are encouraged to register for the class action by January 30, 2026 [2]. - Registered shareholders will be enrolled in a portfolio monitoring software to receive status updates throughout the lifecycle of the case [2]. - Participation in the case incurs no cost or obligation for shareholders [2]. Group 3: Law Firm Information - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of investors affected by deceit, fraud, and illegal business practices [3]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements or omissions [3].

On December 9, Bitcoin Treasury firm Twenty One Capital made its debut on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), and is trading under the ticker XXI. This latest public listing comes following its merger with Cantor Equity Partners. Following this merger, the company had a stash of a massive 43,514 BTC, worth over $4 billion. This makes it the third-largest BTC holder after Michael Saylor’s Strategy (MSTR) and Bitcoin Miner MARA Holdings Inc. Despite the strong balance-sheet positioning, XXI’s market debu ...

Strategy Inc., the world’s largest Bitcoin treasury company, has submitted a detailed response to MSCI’s consultation on how to classify Digital Asset Treasury Companies (DATs). MSCI has proposed excluding from its Global Investable Market Indexes any company whose digital asset holdings represent 50% or more of total assets. In a letter dated December 10, sent by Executive Chairman Michael Saylor and CEO Phong Le, Strategy argues the move is “misguided” and would have “profoundly harmful consequences” ...

Crypto markets have climbed about 10% since Nov. 20, and ether-linked digital asset treasury companies (DATCOs) have been among the biggest beneficiaries, according to investment bank B. Riley. The bank tied the gains to improving risk appetite after European Central Bank (ECB) comments reignited talk of a gradual shift away from the U.S. dollar as the dominant reserve currency, alongside expectations for interest rate cuts. Across the 25 DATCOs the bank tracks, the group’s median mNAV rose to about 1.0 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) is open to selling Bitcoin to fund dividend payments if necessary, marking a shift in its previous stance on Bitcoin retention [1][3]. Group 1: Company Strategy - CEO Phong Le stated that selling Bitcoin would be considered if the company's trading value fell below the net asset value (mNAV) of its Bitcoin holdings, emphasizing that this would be a last resort [1][2]. - The ultimate goal of the company is to maximize Bitcoin per share, and selling Bitcoin to pay dividends is seen as more accretive under certain conditions [2]. Group 2: Market Position - The company currently holds 650,000 BTC valued at $56.5 billion, representing the largest corporate Bitcoin holdings [5]. - The company's mNAV has recently compressed to 0.99, indicating that it is now valued below its Bitcoin holdings, which reflects a decline in the digital asset treasury trade's appeal [6]. Group 3: Leadership Comments - Michael Saylor, the company's Chair, addressed skepticism regarding the company's willingness to sell Bitcoin for dividends, asserting that it is possible to sell a small fraction of its holdings to cover dividend payments while still increasing Bitcoin holdings [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DeFi Technologies, alleging securities fraud that affected investors between May 12, 2025, and November 14, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that DeFi Technologies faced delays in executing its DeFi arbitrage strategy, which was a key revenue driver for the company [2]. - It is alleged that DeFi Technologies understated the competition from other digital asset treasury companies, impacting its ability to execute its DeFi arbitrage strategy [2]. - The complaint suggests that due to these issues, the company was unlikely to meet its previously issued revenue guidance for the fiscal year 2025 [2]. - Defendants are accused of downplaying the negative impact of these issues on DeFi Technologies' business and financial results, leading to materially false and misleading public statements [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses in DeFi Technologies during the relevant timeframe have until January 30, 2026, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff [3]. - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has extensive expertise in complex securities litigation [4]. - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

Core Insights - The initial success of Bitcoin treasury companies has reversed, with many trading below net asset value (NAV) by late 2025, raising questions about whether this is a temporary dislocation or a structural reprice [1][13][24] Group 1: Market Dynamics - A new class of public companies has emerged, focusing on raising equity or debt to invest in Bitcoin, leading to significant market capitalization but also creating a disconnect with traditional operating businesses [2][5] - Total capital inflows into Bitcoin reached $661 billion since January 2024, with spot ETFs accounting for approximately $34 billion (5.2%) of that flow, indicating a shift towards institutional demand [4][5] - The introduction of fair value accounting by the FASB in late 2023 has allowed companies to evaluate Bitcoin holdings similarly to equities, removing previous impairment charges that distorted financial reporting [6][7] Group 2: Corporate Strategies - Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) pioneered the model of issuing convertible debt to acquire Bitcoin, leading to a cycle of capital raises and asset accumulation [8][9] - Other firms, such as Metaplanet and KindlyMD, have followed suit, raising significant capital to invest in Bitcoin, with KindlyMD raising approximately $763 million [10] - The trend extends beyond Bitcoin, with companies now mandated to accumulate tokens tied to specific blockchain networks, creating persistent buying pressure [11] Group 3: Reflexivity and Valuation - The market has experienced a reflexivity trap, where trading above NAV allows for accretive issuance, but trading below NAV leads to value destruction and halts accumulation [12][16] - By 2025, many treasury companies faced significant discounts, with some trading at over 90% below NAV, driven by shifts in sentiment and macroeconomic conditions [13][14] - Execution quality has become a differentiator, with markets now distinguishing between firms perceived as competent and those with governance concerns [15] Group 4: Future Outlook - The survival of treasury companies hinges on their ability to navigate the current discount cycle, with early signs of stabilization observed in some firms [21][22] - Macro conditions, such as potential interest rate cuts, could influence the ability of these companies to raise capital and stabilize their valuations [22] - The industry may see consolidation, with stronger firms acquiring weaker ones, as management teams must demonstrate value beyond mere asset custody [23][25]

Following the launch of its innovative $WLFI Treasury strategy, ALT5 now operates across three distinct segments: its $WLFI Treasury, an established and revenue generating Fintech & Payments business, and its legacy Biotech business. With a focus on disciplined capital allocation and long-term decision-making, management believes each segment has unique value drivers and viable strategies designed to drive growth and success. $WLFI Treasury LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ALT5 Sigma Corporation (the "Company†or ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against DeFi Technologies, Inc. for misleading statements regarding its financial performance and business operations during the specified Class Period from May 12, 2025, to November 14, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that DeFi Technologies made false and misleading statements about delays in executing its DeFi arbitrage strategy, which is a key revenue driver [5]. - It is alleged that the company understated the competition it faced from other digital asset treasury companies, impacting its ability to execute its strategy [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that DeFi Technologies was unlikely to meet its previously issued revenue guidance for the fiscal year 2025 due to these issues [5]. Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who purchased DeFi Technologies securities during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - Interested investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly [3][6]. Group 3: Law Firm Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].