SAN FRANCISCO, Oct. 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Nutex Health Inc. (NASDAQ: NUTX), a publicly traded operator of micro-hospitals and healthcare facilities, is under legal scrutiny following a class-action lawsuit that accuses the company of orchestrating a deceptive billing strategy to artificially boost its financial results. The litigation, filed in a Texas federal court, alleges that Nutex collaborated with third-party billing firm HaloMD to submit ineligible insurance claims, misleading shareholders and ...

Core Viewpoint - Nutex Health Inc. is facing legal scrutiny due to a class-action lawsuit alleging deceptive billing practices that artificially inflated its financial results [1][10] Group 1: Legal Allegations - The lawsuit claims Nutex collaborated with HaloMD to submit ineligible insurance claims, misleading shareholders and causing significant losses [1][2] - Allegations include a systematic effort to exploit the insurance arbitration process, submitting thousands of questionable claims to extract outsized reimbursements [2][4] - The revenue model of Nutex is described as unstable, with financial statements failing to accurately reflect the company's operations [3] Group 2: Market Reaction - Following the release of a report by Blue Orca Capital, which accused HaloMD of a fraudulent scheme, Nutex shares dropped over 10% [4][5] - After Nutex announced a delay in its Form 10-Q submission, shares plunged 16.39%, closing at $92.91 [7] Group 3: Financial Reporting Issues - The lawsuit asserts that Nutex misrepresented its progress in addressing internal control deficiencies, particularly in misclassifying stock-based compensation obligations [6] - On August 21, Nutex disclosed that its Audit Committee determined certain prior financial statements required restatement due to incorrect classifications [8] Group 4: Investor Impact - The class-action suit seeks to recover damages for investors who acquired Nutex securities during the alleged misrepresentation period [10][11] - Plaintiffs argue that the company's public disclosures were materially misleading, leading to significant investor harm when the true financial condition was revealed [11]