Company Overview - The Cooper Companies operates through two segments: CooperVision, focused on contact lenses, and CooperSurgical, which addresses fertility and women's health care [1][4] - CooperVision accounts for 66% of revenue and is a global leader in contact lens wearers, holding a 26% market share, competing with Johnson & Johnson (37%), Alcon (26%), and Bausch + Lomb (10%) [4] - CooperSurgical contributes 33% of revenue, with 60% from office and surgical services and 40% from fertility services [6] Market Dynamics - The global soft contact lens market is valued at approximately $11 billion, growing at an annual rate of 4% to 6%, driven by a shift to silicone hydrogel 1-day lenses and increasing global contact lens users [5] - The fertility treatment market is a $2 billion global market, also expected to grow at a 4% to 6% pace annually [6] Strategic Challenges - Cooper has been reallocating cash from its profitable contact lens business to CooperSurgical, which has led to declining returns on capital and lower margins in the surgical segment [8][10] - Management changes, particularly the appointment of CEO Albert White, have raised questions about the company's strategic focus, as he previously led CooperSurgical [9] Recent Developments - Jana Partners has taken a position in Cooper and is advocating for strategic alternatives, including a potential merger of its contact lens unit with Bausch + Lomb [3][12] - A merger would not create a market leader, as the combined market share would be 36%, just below Johnson & Johnson's 37% [13] - The complementary nature of the businesses suggests minimal regulatory hurdles for a potential merger [14] Financial Performance - Cooper's share price fell 12.85% following a significant reduction in full-year guidance due to lower-than-expected organic growth in both segments [11] - The company is currently trading at a 12-month forward P/E of 16.4x, a discount compared to its 10-year average of 23.1x [11] Strategic Recommendations - Jana Partners suggests that separating the two business units could yield $300 million to $500 million in synergies, which is substantial for a business generating $850 million in EBITDA [16] - If management resists separation, the focus may shift to leadership changes, potentially appointing a new CEO with expertise in the contact lens industry [17][18]