格拉夫项链
Search documents
一条项链、一双鞋、三只包,金建希收受名牌奢品遭查扣
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-10-22 10:54
资料图:金建希。 中新网10月22日电 据韩联社报道,当地时间22日,韩国负责调查前总统尹锡悦夫人金建希弊案的独立 检察组表示,已查扣统一教方面为谋取不正当利益而向金建希提供的高价物品。 一条项链、一双鞋、三只包,金建希收受名牌奢品遭查扣 据报道,独检组22日在例行记者会上透露,"乾津法师"全成培(音)的律师21日下午主动向独检组提交了 市价6220万韩元(约合人民币31万元)的一条格拉夫项链,以及金建希在收下后退换的一双香奈儿鞋、三 只香奈儿包。 独检组表示,查扣物品后已核对序列号等信息,确认与相关线索一致。将在后续庭审中,通过追加证人 申请等程序,明确物品的交付、返还及保管情况。 报道称,独检组自立案调查初期就追踪了格拉夫项链、香奈儿包等物品去向,但始终未能掌握足以证明 金建希本人已实际收受的确凿证据。 报道还称,全成培在之前的调查中曾主张项链和包均已丢失,但近期在庭审中翻供,为独检组提供了新 的线索。全成培方面在向法院提交的意见书中明确指出,统一教高价物品的最终归属人是金建希。 本文为转载内容,授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有,未经书面授权,任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注 ...
金建希首次庭审否认全部指控
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-09-25 16:53
Group 1 - The first hearing related to former South Korean First Lady Kim Keon-hee's corruption charges took place on September 24, marking a historic moment as she is the first former First Lady to appear as a defendant in court [2] - Kim Keon-hee faces three main charges: 1) colluding with individuals from Deutsche Motors to manipulate stock prices, resulting in illegal profits of approximately 810 million KRW; 2) receiving free public opinion survey services valued at around 270 million KRW during the presidential election campaign; 3) accepting high-priced luxury items, including a Chanel handbag and a Graff necklace, worth about 80 million KRW from a religious figure [3] - The courtroom atmosphere was tense, with a full audience of journalists and the public present, and the hearing lasted only 40 minutes before the judge adjourned [4] Group 2 - Kim Keon-hee's defense team completely denied the allegations, arguing that she had previously been cleared of suspicion in the stock manipulation case and had no involvement in the alleged collusion [3] - The defense emphasized that Kim Keon-hee only received individual poll results through KakaoTalk and that the campaign team conducted extensive polling independently [3] - Regarding the bribery case involving the Unification Church, the defense claimed that Kim Keon-hee did not receive any items and suggested that there was a delivery error based on text message evidence [3]