The lawsuit, Laborers' District Council & Contractors' Pension Fund of Ohio v. James Hardie Industries plc., et al., 25-cv-13018 (N.D. Ill.), filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or acquired James Hardie common stock—which converted from American Depositary Shares on July 1, 2025—between May 20, 2025, and August 18, 2025 (the "Class Period"), seeks damages for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. Accessibility StatementSkip Navigation SAN FR ...

Core Viewpoint - James Hardie Industries plc is facing significant legal and financial challenges following a sharp decline in its stock price and allegations of securities fraud related to misleading statements about inventory levels and customer demand in its North American segment [2][8]. Company Developments - The company announced the departure of its CFO, Rachel Wilson, and appointed Ryan Lada as her replacement on November 17, 2025 [1]. - The stock price collapsed by 34% on August 20, 2025, following the disclosure of poor performance in the North America Fiber Cement division [2][8]. Legal Issues - A class-action lawsuit has been filed against James Hardie and certain executives, alleging securities fraud for misleading investors about inventory levels and customer demand during the class period from May 20, 2025, to August 18, 2025 [4][5]. - The lawsuit seeks damages for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, specifically Sections 10(b) and 20(a) [4]. Financial Performance - The North America Fiber Cement segment, which generates approximately 80% of the company's total earnings, has been at the center of the allegations [5]. - The company reported a 12% decline in sales for this segment, attributing it to inventory destocking that management had previously denied [7]. Market Reaction - Following the disclosure of the sales decline, the market reacted negatively, resulting in a significant drop in the company's stock price [8]. - The plaintiffs argue that the stock price decline and subsequent investor losses were directly linked to the alleged wrongful acts and omissions by the company's management [8].

Core Viewpoint - A new securities class action lawsuit has been filed against CarMax, Inc., expanding the class period to include investors who acquired CarMax securities between June 20, 2025, and November 5, 2025, following significant market reactions to the company's leadership changes and financial disclosures [1][2][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The expanded class period now includes investors affected by the announcement of CEO Bill Nash's termination, which led to a share price drop of $9.48, or 23%, on November 6, 2025 [2]. - The lawsuit focuses on allegations that CarMax misled investors regarding its business model and growth prospects, particularly in light of its Q1 2026 earnings claims [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Performance - On June 20, 2025, CarMax reported a double-digit EPS growth for Q1 2026, claiming a strong market position, but the lawsuit alleges this was misleading as it did not account for consumers pulling forward purchases to avoid tariffs [4]. - CarMax's Q2 2026 results revealed a 24% year-over-year decline in net EPS, a 5.4% drop in retail used unit sales, and a 6.3% decrease in comparable store used unit sales [5]. - Concerns were raised about the quality of CarMax's Auto Finance loan portfolio, with an 11.02% revenue decline attributed to a $142 million loan loss provision, marking a nearly 40% sequential increase and a 24% year-over-year rise [6]. Group 3: Market Reaction and Analyst Commentary - Following the CEO's termination, analysts expressed concerns that the situation indicated deeper issues within CarMax, shifting perceptions from a value play to a potential "falling knife" scenario [7].