Accessibility StatementSkip Navigation James (Josh) Wilson, Faruqi & Faruqi Senior Partner (PRNewsfoto/Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP) Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com. As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading s ...

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against KBR, Inc. related to a federal securities class action lawsuit, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for November 18, 2025 [2][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - A federal securities class action has been filed against KBR, alleging violations of federal securities laws due to false or misleading statements regarding the company's partnership with HomeSafe and its ability to fulfill the Global Household Goods Contract [5][6]. - The lawsuit claims that KBR executives misrepresented the status of the partnership, despite knowing about the U.S. Department of Defense's concerns, leading to materially false statements about the company's business and operations [5][7]. Group 2: Stock Performance - Following the announcement of the termination of the Global Household Goods Contract by HomeSafe, KBR's stock price dropped by $3.85, or 7.29%, closing at $48.93 on June 20, 2025, and further declined by $1.30, or 2.65%, to close at $47.63 on June 23, 2025 [7]. Group 3: Investor Information - Investors who acquired KBR securities between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025, are encouraged to contact Faruqi & Faruqi to discuss their legal rights and options regarding the class action [1][2]. - The firm is also seeking information from whistleblowers, former employees, and shareholders regarding KBR's conduct [9].

Core Viewpoint - KBR, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit from investors who purchased securities during the specified class period, following a significant drop in stock price due to the termination of a key contract [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The Portnoy Law Firm is advising KBR investors of a class action for those who bought securities between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until November 18, 2025, to file a lead plaintiff motion [1]. Group 2: Stock Price Impact - On June 20, 2025, KBR's stock price fell by $3.85 per share, or 7.29%, closing at $48.93 per share after the announcement of the termination of HomeSafe's role in a significant contract [3]. Group 3: Legal Representation - The Portnoy Law Firm offers complimentary case evaluations for investors to discuss their legal rights and options for recovering losses [2]. - The firm has a history of recovering over $5.5 billion for aggrieved investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against KBR, Inc. on behalf of investors who acquired shares during the specified Class Period, alleging failure to disclose material concerns regarding a key military contract [1][3]. Group 1: Company Overview - KBR, Inc. is a Houston-based engineering, technology, and government services firm that provides logistics and operations support to various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense [2]. Group 2: Allegations and Impact - The complaint alleges that KBR did not disclose ongoing concerns from the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) about HomeSafe's ability to fulfill the Global Household Goods Contract during the Class Period [3]. - On June 19, 2025, HomeSafe announced the termination of the contract by TRANSCOM, leading to a significant drop in KBR's share price by $3.85, or 7%, closing at $48.93 on June 20, 2025 [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Law Offices of Howard G. Smith has announced a securities fraud class action lawsuit against KBR, Inc. for failing to disclose material concerns regarding its partnership with TRANSCOM and the implications for its business operations [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit alleges that from May 6, 2025, to June 19, 2025, KBR, Inc. misled investors by claiming that there were no issues with its partnership with TRANSCOM, despite being aware of significant concerns regarding HomeSafe's ability to fulfill the Global Household Goods Contract [3]. - The complaint states that KBR's positive statements about its business and prospects were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis during the relevant period [3]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors who suffered losses in KBR, Inc. are encouraged to contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith before November 18, 2025, to participate in the ongoing class action lawsuit [2][4]. - Individuals interested in learning more about the class action or their rights can reach out to the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith via email or phone [4][5].

Core Points - KBR, Inc. is facing a securities class action lawsuit for failing to disclose material information during the class period from May 6, 2025, to June 19, 2025 [1][3] - The lawsuit is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, with a deadline of November 18, 2025, for investors to file lead plaintiff applications [1][5] - The lawsuit is linked to a significant drop in KBR's stock price following the termination of a contract by HomeSafe Alliance, a joint venture in which KBR holds a 72% economic interest [4] Company Information - HomeSafe Alliance, a joint venture of KBR, was awarded a contract by the U.S. Department of Defense to improve the military move system but had the contract terminated, leading to a notable decline in KBR's stock price [4] - Following the contract termination announcement, KBR's shares fell by $3.85 (7.29%) to close at $48.93 on June 20, 2025, and further declined by $1.30 (2.65%) to close at $47.63 on June 23, 2025 [4] Legal Context - The case is identified as Norrman v. KBR, Inc., et al., No. 25-cv-04464, highlighting the legal implications for KBR and its executives regarding the alleged failure to disclose critical information [5]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against KBR, Inc. by Berger Montague on behalf of investors who acquired KBR shares between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025, due to undisclosed concerns regarding a key military contract [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit alleges that KBR failed to disclose material concerns from the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) regarding HomeSafe's ability to fulfill the Global Household Goods Contract [3]. - KBR reassured investors that the contract would proceed as expected, despite being aware of the issues within the partnership [3]. - Following the disclosure of the contract termination by HomeSafe on June 19, 2025, KBR's shares dropped by $3.85, or 7%, closing at $48.93 on June 20, 2025 [4]. Group 2: Company Background - KBR, Inc. is a Houston-based firm specializing in engineering, technology, and government services, providing logistics and operations support to various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense [2].

Group 1 - A class action has been filed against KBR, Inc. on behalf of investors who acquired its securities between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025 [1] - The allegations center around KBR's joint venture, HomeSafe Alliance, which has a 72% economic interest from KBR and was awarded a contract by the U.S. Department of Defense's TRANSCOM [2] - It is claimed that KBR misled investors about HomeSafe's ability to fulfill the Global Household Goods Contract, despite knowing of TRANSCOM's concerns [3] Group 2 - On June 19, 2025, HomeSafe announced a notice to terminate the Global Household Goods Contract, revealing ongoing issues with TRANSCOM [4] - Following the announcement, KBR's stock price dropped by $3.85 (7.29%) to close at $48.93 on June 20, 2025, and further fell by $1.30 (2.65%) to close at $47.63 on June 23, 2025 [4] - Shareholders interested in leading the class action must submit their papers by November 18, 2025, and can remain absent class members if they choose not to participate [5]