Core Viewpoint - Midstream operators are positioned to benefit from increasing demand for natural gas driven by artificial intelligence, data centers, and LNG exports, while providing reliable cash flow and high distribution yields. Group 1: Energy Transfer - Energy Transfer offers a yield of 7.4%, supported by strong distributable cash flow, with approximately 90% of EBITDA derived from fee-based contracts, many of which are take-or-pay [2][4] - The company is increasing its capital expenditures from $3 billion in 2024 to $5 billion this year to capitalize on growing power demand and LNG exports [3] - Energy Transfer has signed a supply agreement with Cloudburst for a data center project in Texas and is seeing progress on the Lake Charles LNG project, enhancing its growth prospects [4] Group 2: Enterprise Products Partners - Enterprise Products Partners has a yield of 6.8% and has increased its payout for 26 consecutive years, with about 85% of cash flow coming from fee-based contracts [5][6] - The company is pursuing $7.6 billion in growth projects, with $6 billion expected to go live this year, and has increased its spending on these projects from $3.9 billion last year to $4.5 billion this year [6] Group 3: Western Midstream - Western Midstream offers a yield of 9.4% and maintains a strong balance sheet with a leverage ratio below 3, supported by cost-of-service contracts and minimum volume commitments [7][8] - The company aims for mid-single-digit annual distribution increases while investing in expansion opportunities, notably the Pathfinder produced-water system, which is projected to cost over $450 million [8] Group 4: MPLX - MPLX has a yield of 7.5% and has achieved double-digit distribution growth for three consecutive years, with its distribution covered 1.5 times by cash flow [9][10] - The company is increasing its expansion capex to $1.7 billion in 2025, driven by demand for natural gas and NGLs, and is enhancing its infrastructure through full ownership of the BANGL pipeline and a joint venture with Oneok [10][11] Group 5: Kinder Morgan - Kinder Morgan has the lowest yield at 4.1% but controls about 40% of U.S. natural gas flow, with 80% of cash flow from volumetric fee-based contracts [13][15] - The company's project backlog has surged to $8.8 billion, primarily focused on power demand related to AI and LNG facilities, with expected EBITDA yields of 16.7% on new spending [14][15] - Kinder Morgan has improved its balance sheet, reducing leverage from 5.1 in 2017 to 4 in 2024, positioning itself well for future growth amid rising natural gas export demand [15]