Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is facing unprecedented demand growth for power, primarily driven by AI data centers and re-onshoring of U.S. manufacturing [5][11] - The average active coal, gas, and nuclear plant in the U.S. is over 40 years old, indicating a need for new baseload power generation capacity [4] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is pivoting towards conventional gas power with Post-Combustion Carbon Capture (PCC) technology, which is seen as a more immediate opportunity compared to its oxycombustion technology [20][27] - The first phase of the Project Permian in West Texas is targeting a levelized cost of energy (LCOE) below $80 per MWh, with plans to scale to 300 MW and beyond [24][25] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The U.S. has over 50 years of ultra-low-cost natural gas reserves, positioning it uniquely compared to other countries [12] - The market is increasingly favoring natural gas as a reliable and scalable power source, especially for data centers [12][15] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to transform natural gas into the lowest-cost form of clean, reliable power while also focusing on speed to market [11][27] - A partnership with Entropy is being pursued to accelerate the deployment of clean gas projects in the U.S., leveraging their expertise in PCC technology [24][30] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management acknowledges the urgent need for new power generation to meet increasing demand, particularly from AI and data centers [11][69] - The company believes that the deployment of clean gas technology can occur much sooner than previously anticipated, positioning it ahead of competitors [46][68] Other Important Information - The company has faced rising costs for its first facility, leading to a reassessment of its capital allocation strategy [19][20] - The partnership with Entropy is expected to enhance the company's ability to deliver clean, firm power projects quickly [24][30] Q&A Session Summary Question: What makes NET Power uniquely positioned to take advantage of this opportunity? - Management highlighted the company's understanding of both power generation and subsurface resources, as well as its existing high-quality sites for deployment [42][44] Question: Why partner with Entropy? - The partnership is based on Entropy's operational experience and proven technology, which allows for the acceleration of clean power projects in the U.S. [49][50] Question: What is the financing strategy for phase one and follow-on projects? - The financing strategy involves leveraging proven technologies for project financing, reducing the need for equity financing compared to previous plans [59][61] Question: What enables the sub-$80 LCOE in the Permian compared to $100 in MISO? - The lower cost in West Texas is attributed to cheaper natural gas and the ability to utilize CO2 for industrial purposes, enhancing project economics [74][78] Question: How is the business model changing from capital light to capital heavy? - The company is focusing on appropriately sizing projects to accommodate its balance sheet and access to capital while ensuring a competitive edge in the market [82]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is facing unprecedented demand growth for power, primarily driven by artificial intelligence and data centers, as well as re-onshoring of US manufacturing and growing residential demand for power [5][10] - The average active coal, gas, and nuclear plant in the U.S. is over 40 years old, indicating a need for new baseload power generation capacity [4] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is pivoting towards conventional gas power with post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) technology, which is seen as a more immediate opportunity compared to its oxycombustion technology [18][25] - The first phase of the Project Permian in West Texas is targeting a levelized cost of energy (LCOE) below $80 per megawatt hour, with plans to scale to 300 megawatts and beyond [22][30] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The U.S. has over 50 years of ultra-low-cost natural gas reserves, positioning it uniquely compared to other countries [11][12] - The market is increasingly favoring natural gas as a reliable and scalable power source, especially in the context of AI and data center demands [10][11] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to transform natural gas into the lowest-cost form of clean, reliable power while ensuring affordability and reliability [10][25] - A partnership with Entropy is being pursued to accelerate the deployment of clean gas projects in the U.S., leveraging their expertise in PCC technology [20][27] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management emphasizes the urgency of building new generation capacity to meet rising power demands, particularly in light of the AI race [8][10] - The company acknowledges the challenges posed by rising costs and the need for a strategic pivot to capitalize on near-term opportunities while maintaining long-term goals [17][18] Other Important Information - The company has identified high-quality locations for its projects, which are essential for economic viability [15][16] - The partnership with Entropy is expected to enhance the company's ability to deploy clean gas power projects quickly and efficiently [20][27] Q&A Session Summary Question: What makes NET Power uniquely positioned to take advantage of this opportunity? - The company possesses a fundamental understanding of both power generation and subsurface resources, along with high-quality sites for deployment [36][39] Question: Why partner with Entropy? - The partnership is based on Entropy's operational experience and proven technology, which allows for the acceleration of clean power projects in the U.S. [42][46] Question: What is the financing strategy for phase one and follow-on projects? - The financing strategy involves leveraging proven technologies for project financing, reducing the equity capital burden compared to previous plans [48][50]