Core Points - Rumble Inc. has been added to the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000 indexes effective June 30, 2025, which is part of the annual Russell indexes reconstitution [1][2] - Membership in the Russell 3000 Index provides automatic inclusion in the Russell 1000 and Russell 2000 indexes, as well as relevant growth and value style indexes [2] - The addition to the Russell 2000 Index is expected to enhance awareness and ownership of Rumble's stock among institutional investors, as stated by the company's Chairman and CEO, Chris Pavlovski [3] Company Overview - Rumble is a high-growth video-sharing platform and cloud services provider focused on creating an independent infrastructure and restoring the internet to its roots by promoting a free and open environment [4] - The company aims to increase its visibility and attract institutional investment through its inclusion in major indexes [3] Industry Context - FTSE Russell, the provider of the Russell indexes, manages approximately $10.6 trillion in assets benchmarked against its U.S. indexes, indicating the significance of these indexes in the investment community [3] - FTSE Russell is a global leader in index provision, covering 98% of the investable market globally, which highlights the importance of index membership for companies like Rumble [5]

Core Points - Rumble Canada and Rebel News Network are suing the Canadian government and officials for allegedly infringing on their constitutional right to free expression [1][5] - The lawsuit claims that officials attempted to block two public gatherings by imposing excessive security fees, which were deemed unnecessary [2][3] - The plaintiffs are seeking $37,177.80 for security costs, $250,000 in punitive damages, and legal expenses [1] Company Overview - Rumble is a high-growth video platform and cloud services provider aiming to restore an open internet [9] - Rebel News Network operates as an independent online news and media company, accredited by various governments [9] Legal Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that local officials were aware there were no threats of unrest but still imposed high security charges to disrupt the events [3][4] - Internal communications suggest that officials sought ways to prevent the events based on the political beliefs of the participants [3][4] - The rental agreement for the venue included provisions to uphold free speech principles, which the plaintiffs argue were violated [6][5] Political Context - MP Ya'ara Saks is named as a defendant and is accused of attempting to interfere with the events due to political motivations related to her electoral competition [7][8] - This lawsuit follows previous allegations against government officials for blocking Rebel News from accessing official social media accounts [7]