State Street SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (RWX)
Search documents
GQRE Offers Higher Yield and Growth Than RWX
Yahoo Finance· 2026-03-18 22:02
Core Insights - The FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) is characterized by lower costs, higher yield, and a focused real estate strategy, while the State Street SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (RWX) offers a more diversified geographic mix and has shown stronger one-year performance [1][2] Cost and Size Comparison - GQRE has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which is lower than RWX's 0.59% - GQRE provides a higher dividend yield of 4.5% compared to RWX's 3.6% - As of March 16, 2026, RWX has a one-year return of 19.0%, while GQRE's return is 12.9% - GQRE has assets under management (AUM) of $357.2 million, surpassing RWX's $288.0 million [3][4] Performance and Risk Comparison - Over five years, RWX experienced a maximum drawdown of 35.9%, while GQRE had a slightly lower drawdown of 35.1% - An investment of $1,000 would have grown to $985 in RWX and $1,202 in GQRE over the same period [5] Portfolio Composition - GQRE allocates 96% of its assets to real estate companies, holding 174 positions, with top holdings including American Tower, Prologis, and Welltower, which together account for about 15% of the fund [6] - RWX holds 121 securities across various geographies, with Japan representing approximately 29% and the United Kingdom about 13% of its portfolio [7] Investor Outlook - Investors are optimistic about real estate in 2026 due to stabilizing interest rates and potential rate cuts, with RWX possibly offering better values, contributing to its outperformance over U.S.-focused real estate funds in the past year [8] - GQRE's focus on the U.S. real estate market may provide stability through higher-quality REITs, leading to its outperformance against RWX since March 2021 [9]
REET vs. RWX: Which Global Real Estate ETF Is the Better Buy?
Yahoo Finance· 2026-03-18 20:00
Core Insights - The State Street SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (RWX) focuses on international real estate outside the U.S., while the iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) offers global real estate exposure at a lower cost and with broader diversification [1][2]. Cost and Size Comparison - RWX has an expense ratio of 0.59% and assets under management (AUM) of $310.5 million, whereas REET has a lower expense ratio of 0.14% and AUM of $4.8 billion [3][4]. - Both ETFs have a dividend yield of 3.4% [3]. Performance and Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, RWX experienced a maximum drawdown of -35.89%, while REET had a drawdown of -32.06% [5]. - An investment of $1,000 would have grown to $799 in RWX and $996 in REET over the same period [5]. Portfolio Composition - REET includes over 300 global real estate firms, with top holdings such as Welltower (8.5%), Prologis (7.2%), and Equinix (5.5%), providing diversified exposure across geographies and property types [6]. - RWX focuses on international real estate, with 29% of its assets in Japan and top holdings including Mitsui Fudosan Co (7.0%), Swiss Prime Site Reg (3.1%), and SEGRO Plc (3.0%) [7]. Investor Considerations - The choice between REET and RWX primarily depends on whether investors prefer global real estate exposure or exclusively international exposure without U.S. overlap [8]. - REET's lower expense ratio provides a significant advantage that compounds over time, making it a more attractive option for many investors [8][9].
U.S. REIT Exposure or Global Real Estate Diversification? VNQ vs. RWX
Yahoo Finance· 2026-03-18 16:40
Cost Comparison - Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a low expense ratio of 0.13%, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (RWX) has a higher expense ratio of 0.59% [1][4] - VNQ has assets under management (AUM) of $69.6 billion, significantly larger than RWX's AUM of $310.51 million [3][6] Performance Metrics - As of March 16, 2026, VNQ reported a 1-year return of 1.3%, while RWX had a much higher return of 13.4% [3] - VNQ's maximum drawdown over five years was -34.48%, compared to RWX's -35.92% [5] - An investment of $1,000 in VNQ would have grown to $1,003 over five years, while the same investment in RWX would have decreased to $797 [5] Portfolio Composition - VNQ focuses primarily on U.S. real estate, with 98% of its assets in this sector, and holds 158 stocks [7] - The top holdings in VNQ include Welltower Inc (8.81%), Prologis Inc (8.29%), and Equinix Inc (5.99%) [7] - RWX invests in international real estate companies, with 121 holdings, including Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd (7.06%), Swiss Prime Site Reg (3.17%), and Scentre Group (2.91%) [6] Investment Strategy - VNQ targets the U.S. REIT market, influenced by domestic interest rates and property trends [9] - RWX invests in developed markets outside the U.S., such as Japan, Europe, and Australia, which exposes it to different currency changes and interest rate cycles [10]