Core Viewpoint - A federal judge has dismissed Donald Trump's $15 billion lawsuit against The New York Times, citing improper filing and excessive political rhetoric, allowing for a potential refiling with a shorter complaint [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit was criticized for its length and tone, spanning 85 pages with defamation claims appearing only on page 80 [1]. - The court has given Trump's legal team 28 days to submit a revised complaint not exceeding 40 pages [3]. - The complaint accused The New York Times and its reporters of defamation, claiming damages to Trump's reputation and brand value [3][4]. Group 2: Content of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit included extensive praise for Trump's business career and attacks on "legacy media," which the court deemed excessive and irrelevant [2]. - Trump alleged that The New York Times acted as a "mouthpiece of the Democrat Party" and engaged in "persistent election interference" [4]. Group 3: Market Reactions - The dismissal of the lawsuit has led to significant sell pressure on the Trump-linked $TRUMP coin, reflecting legal uncertainty and volatility in assets associated with Trump's political brand [5][6]. - The case serves as a reminder of the risks associated with political tokens, prompting calls for stronger investor education within the crypto sector [6].

Core Points - A federal judge dismissed Donald Trump's $15 billion lawsuit against The New York Times, stating the complaint was "improper and impermissible" [1][2] - The judge allowed Trump's legal team to file a new complaint within 28 days, with a maximum length of 48 pages [1] - The lawsuit accused The New York Times of being a "mouthpiece of the Democrat party" and claimed it misrepresented Trump's rise to fame [3] Legal Proceedings - Judge Steven Merryday emphasized that the complaint did not adhere to the requirements of Rule 8, which governs the format and content of legal complaints [2][4] - The judge criticized the complaint for being more of a public relations statement rather than a formal legal document, stating it should inform defendants in a professional manner [4] Trump's Position - Trump's lawsuit included grievances against specific articles and authors, claiming they falsely portrayed his celebrity status as being created by the show "The Apprentice" [3] - A spokesperson for Trump's legal team indicated that the lawsuit aims to hold the media accountable and will continue despite the judge's ruling [4] The New York Times' Response - The New York Times responded to the lawsuit by asserting that it lacks merit and is an attempt to suppress independent journalism [4]

I think it's some of the sort of the elites miss the allure of the apprentice. I watched every episode. Well, and there's something I think it had it checked all the boxes, right.There was a reality TV aspect to it which is so attractive to so many people. I watched American Idol for years. I watched So You Think You Can Dance.I mean, there's something about reality TV where you don't know what's going to happen. And then there was this aspirational American story about success and the apprentice. But I fee ...