Workflow
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index ETF
icon
Search documents
VYM Is a Popular Dividend ETF for Passive Income. But Is It the Best?
The Motley Fool· 2025-07-29 08:43
Core Viewpoint - Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VYM) has approximately $75 billion in assets, indicating its popularity among investors, but it may not be the best dividend ETF available [1] Group 1: ETF Overview - Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index ETF is an exchange-traded fund that pools investors' money for management [2] - The ETF aims to track the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which includes companies with high dividend yields and a history of above-average dividend payments [4][5] Group 2: Investment Strategy - The FTSE High Dividend Yield Index identifies dividend-paying companies on U.S. exchanges and selects the top 50% with the highest yields [5] - The ETF holds around 580 stocks, providing wide diversification across dividend stocks [7] Group 3: Performance Metrics - The current dividend yield of the ETF is 2.6%, which is better than the S&P 500 index but lower than some other dividend-focused ETFs [8] - The expense ratio of the ETF is low at 0.06%, comparable to other higher-yielding dividend ETFs [8] Group 4: Selection Process Concerns - The ETF's selection process does not differentiate between well-managed and troubled companies, focusing solely on yield [9] - This could result in a portfolio that includes both high-quality and poor-performing companies [9] Group 5: Alternatives - Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is presented as a better alternative, offering a yield of approximately 3.8%, notable diversification, and a focus on financially strong companies, with a similar expense ratio of 0.06% [11]
VYM: A Potential Rate Cut Loser (Rating Downgrade)
Seeking Alpha· 2025-07-28 21:55
Group 1 - The Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index ETF (NYSEARCA: VYM) has shown strong performance over the past year [1] - The ETF is currently overweight in the financial sector, which may negatively impact its net asset value in a scenario of federal fund rate cuts [1]