Workflow
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ)
icon
Search documents
VNQI vs. HAUZ: These ETFs Offer Investors Exposure to Real Estate Around the World
The Motley Fool· 2026-01-10 19:00
Core Insights - The article discusses two prominent real estate ETFs, the Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and the Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ), which provide investors with exposure to international real estate markets outside the United States [2][4]. Cost & Size Comparison - HAUZ has an expense ratio of 0.10% and assets under management (AUM) of $951.9 million, while VNQI has an expense ratio of 0.12% and AUM of $3.53 billion [3]. - The one-year return for HAUZ is 21.27%, compared to VNQI's 19.63%, and the dividend yield for HAUZ is 4.34%, slightly lower than VNQI's 4.58% [3][4]. Performance & Risk Metrics - Over a five-year period, HAUZ experienced a maximum drawdown of -34.54%, while VNQI had a slightly higher drawdown of -35.76% [5]. - The growth of a $1,000 investment over five years would result in $891 for HAUZ and $876 for VNQI [5]. Fund Composition - VNQI holds 742 assets and focuses on global real estate excluding the U.S., with major holdings including Goodman Group, Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd., and Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. [6]. - HAUZ, being three years younger, has nearly 300 fewer holdings than VNQI and excludes companies from Pakistan and Vietnam in addition to the U.S. [7]. Dividend Payout Frequency - HAUZ has historically paid dividends semiannually, resulting in two payments per year, while VNQI switched from quarterly to annual payments in 2023, offering a larger lump sum payment [9].
RWX vs. HAUZ: Which International Real Estate ETF Is the Better Buy?
The Motley Fool· 2026-01-04 18:37
Core Insights - RWX and HAUZ provide different approaches to international real estate exposure, with RWX having a higher expense ratio and fewer holdings compared to HAUZ, which offers lower fees and higher yields [1][2] Cost and Size Comparison - HAUZ has an expense ratio of 0.10%, significantly lower than RWX's 0.59%, which is six times higher [3][4] - HAUZ's one-year return is 22.7%, while RWX's is 26.9%, indicating RWX's better short-term performance [3] - HAUZ offers a dividend yield of 3.91%, compared to RWX's 3.36% [3] Performance and Risk Analysis - Over five years, HAUZ experienced a maximum drawdown of -34.5%, while RWX had a slightly higher drawdown of -35.9% [5] - A $1,000 investment in HAUZ would have grown to $1,056 over five years, compared to $1,014 for RWX, indicating HAUZ's superior long-term performance [5][8] Portfolio Composition - RWX tracks the Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Select Real Estate Securities Index with 120 holdings, focusing on major companies like Mitsui Fudosan Co. [6] - HAUZ has a broader portfolio with 408 holdings, including significant positions in Goodman Group and Mitsubishi Estate Company, appealing for diversification [7] Historical Performance - Since 2013, HAUZ has achieved an annual total return growth of 3.3%, while RWX's growth was only 1.4% [8] - HAUZ's better performance is attributed to its lower expense ratio and higher dividend yield, alongside a smaller five-year drawdown [8] Investment Considerations - Both ETFs have overlapping holdings, with five of the top ten positions being the same, but HAUZ is favored for its cost efficiency and broader diversification [9] - Investors should be aware of the geographical focus, with both funds having significant allocations to Japanese REITs and other countries like Australia and the U.K. [9]
HAUZ vs REET: Global Real Estate or a U.S.-Anchored REIT Portfolio
The Motley Fool· 2025-12-31 03:30
Core Insights - The Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and the iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) provide different exposures to global real estate markets, with HAUZ focusing on international markets outside the U.S. and REET being more concentrated in U.S. REITs [1][10] Cost and Size Comparison - HAUZ has a lower expense ratio of 0.10% compared to REET's 0.14% - HAUZ offers a 1-year return of 17.2% versus REET's 3.6% - HAUZ has a dividend yield of 3.91%, slightly higher than REET's 3.7% - HAUZ's assets under management (AUM) stand at $940.7 million, while REET has a significantly larger AUM of $4.04 billion [3][4] Performance and Risk Metrics - Over the past five years, HAUZ experienced a maximum drawdown of 34.53%, while REET had a lower drawdown of 32.09% - An investment of $1,000 would have grown to $883 in HAUZ and $1,053 in REET over the same period [5] Underlying Holdings - REET tracks a global index with 328 stocks, heavily weighted towards large U.S. REITs like Welltower Inc, Prologis Reit Inc, and Equinix Reit Inc, which dominate its performance [6][9] - HAUZ holds 408 stocks, with significant investments in companies like Goodman Group, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd, and Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd, providing a more geographically diversified exposure [7] Investment Implications - REET is suitable for investors seeking exposure closely tied to U.S. real estate dynamics, while HAUZ is better for those wanting to diversify away from U.S. market influences [10]