Core Insights - The AVALON study published in the American Journal of Managed Care reinforces the clinical superiority of iRhythm Technologies' Zio long-term continuous monitoring (LTCM) service among commercially insured patients, demonstrating its effectiveness compared to other ambulatory cardiac monitoring (ACM) modalities [1][2][3] Study Findings - AVALON is the largest real-world study of its kind, involving 428,707 commercially insured patients, and shows that the Zio LTCM service has the highest diagnostic yield, fastest time to diagnosis, and lowest total healthcare costs compared to other monitoring modalities [4][6][11] - The Zio LTCM service was associated with a 2.04 times higher likelihood of new arrhythmia diagnosis within 90 days compared to Holter monitors, and 1.69 times compared to ambulatory event monitors (AEM) [8][12] - The median time from end-of-wear to arrhythmia diagnosis for the Zio LTCM service was 9 days, significantly faster than Holter (12 days) and AEM (30 days) [12] - The Zio LTCM service demonstrated the lowest total medical and pharmacy costs at $10,476 per patient-year, compared to Holter ($11,042), AEM ($11,492), and non-iRhythm LTCM services ($11,293) [12] Clinical Implications - The findings indicate that the Zio LTCM service leads to lower healthcare resource utilization, including fewer emergency department visits and hospitalizations, and a lower likelihood of cardiovascular events [11][12] - The study confirms that the Zio LTCM service's advantages extend across diverse patient populations and payer segments, building on previous findings from the Medicare-focused CAMELOT study [6][13] Company Commitment - iRhythm Technologies emphasizes its commitment to delivering clinically meaningful innovations that drive value across the healthcare system, as highlighted by the results of the AVALON study [3][10][14]