amylin treatment
Search documents
Healthy Returns: What to know about Pfizer and Novo Nordisk's bidding war over obesity biotech Metsera
CNBCยท 2025-11-05 15:07
Core Insights - Pfizer and Novo Nordisk are engaged in a competitive bidding war for the obesity biotech Metsera, with both companies increasing their offers as of Monday [3][4] - Metsera has indicated that Novo Nordisk's latest bid of up to $10 billion is superior to Pfizer's revised offer of approximately $8.1 billion [9][10] Group 1: Bidding War Timeline - Pfizer initially proposed to acquire Metsera for $4.9 billion, potentially rising to $7.3 billion with future payments, aiming to enter the obesity market after previous setbacks [5] - Novo Nordisk launched a competing bid valuing Metsera at around $6 billion, or up to $9 billion, prompting Pfizer to renegotiate its offer within a four-business-day deadline [6] - Following Novo Nordisk's bid, Pfizer filed lawsuits against both Novo Nordisk and Metsera, seeking to block the termination of its merger agreement [7][16] Group 2: Market Context and Implications - Metsera, founded in 2022, has a pipeline of oral and injectable treatments, including a GLP-1 drug and a monthly amylin treatment, which could be less frequent than existing weekly injections [11] - The acquisition of Metsera is crucial for Pfizer to penetrate the lucrative obesity market, especially after facing challenges with its own weight loss candidates [12] - Novo Nordisk, a pioneer in the weight loss drug market, is under pressure to regain market share lost to competitors like Eli Lilly and is facing new entrants such as Amgen and Roche [13][14] Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Aspects - Pfizer's lawsuits argue that Novo Nordisk's acquisition of Metsera would reinforce its dominant position in the obesity market by eliminating a potential competitor [16] - Pfizer's first lawsuit seeks to prevent Metsera from terminating its existing merger deal, claiming that Novo Nordisk's offer is not likely to be completed due to regulatory risks [17] - A Delaware judge has scheduled a hearing to review the bidding process, indicating ongoing legal complexities in the acquisition battle [18]