Core Insights - Halliburton Company (HAL) is one of the largest oilfield service providers globally, with a market cap of $22.9 billion, offering a range of services to the energy sector [1] Financial Performance - HAL's stock has underperformed the broader market, with a year-to-date decline of 1.4% and a 52-week drop of 4.7%, while the S&P 500 Index gained 15.1% in 2025 and 18.5% over the past year [2] - The company also lagged behind the iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF, which saw a 2.2% increase in 2025 and a 2.9% rise over the past year [3] - Following the release of better-than-expected Q3 results on October 21, HAL's stock surged 11.6%. The company's Q3 revenue decreased 1.7% year-over-year to $5.6 billion but exceeded expectations by 4%. Adjusted net income fell 22.6% year-over-year to $496 million, while adjusted EPS of $0.58 surpassed consensus estimates by 16% [4] Future Outlook - For the full fiscal year 2025, analysts project HAL to deliver an adjusted EPS of $2.16, reflecting a 27.8% year-over-year decline. However, the company has a strong earnings surprise history, exceeding bottom-line projections in the last four quarters. The consensus rating among 24 analysts is a "Moderate Buy," with 13 "Strong Buys," three "Moderate Buys," and eight "Holds" [5] - A month ago, the stock had a "Strong Sell" rating, indicating a more optimistic outlook now [6] - On November 3, Rothschild & Co analyst initiated coverage on HAL with a "Buy" rating and set a price target of $35. The mean price target of $29.59 suggests a 10.4% premium, while the highest target of $41.50 indicates a potential upside of 54.8% from current levels [7]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR) by Berger Montague on behalf of investors who acquired shares between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, alleging that the company misled investors regarding its financial guidance and undisclosed risks associated with major infrastructure projects [1][3]. Company Overview - Fluor Corporation, headquartered in Irving, Texas, provides engineering, procurement, construction, and project management services globally. Its Urban Solutions segment is the largest revenue contributor among its three segments [2]. Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Fluor and certain executives failed to disclose rising costs related to significant projects, including the Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35 projects, which were impacted by subcontractor design errors, material price increases, and scheduling delays. Additionally, the company allegedly downplayed the adverse effects of reduced client capital spending and broader economic uncertainties [3]. Financial Guidance - In February 2025, Fluor projected an adjusted EPS for the full year 2025 in the range of $2.25 to $2.75 and EBITDA between $575 million and $675 million, which was reaffirmed in May 2025 [4]. Recent Performance - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported disappointing second-quarter results, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.43, missing consensus estimates by 23%, and revenue of $3.98 billion, falling short by $570 million and down 5.9% year-over-year. The company significantly lowered its FY 2025 outlook, attributing the decline to project delays and reduced client awards. CEO James R. Breuer confirmed that the aforementioned projects were responsible for the poor performance. Following this announcement, Fluor's stock price dropped by $15.35, or 27.04%, closing at $41.42 [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (FLR) for allegedly concealing significant cost overruns and execution problems on key infrastructure projects, leading to a sharp decline in stock value and investor confidence [1][3][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased FLR shares between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025 [1][2]. - Investors have until November 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representative of the class [2]. Group 2: Company Background - Fluor Corporation, headquartered in Irving, Texas, provides engineering, procurement, construction, and project management services globally, with its Urban Solutions segment being the largest revenue driver [2]. Group 3: Allegations and Financial Impact - FLR is accused of hiding cost overruns and execution issues on major projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and I-635/LBJ, due to subcontractor errors, supply chain inflation, and construction delays [3]. - The company allegedly overstated its risk mitigation strategy and failed to disclose the impact of reduced client spending and macroeconomic uncertainty [3]. - Despite these issues, FLR reaffirmed its financial guidance in May 2025, but reported disappointing second-quarter results on August 1, 2025, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.43 (missing by $0.13) and revenue of $3.98 billion (missing by $570 million) [4]. - Following these disclosures, FLR's stock fell by 27.04% to a closing price of $41.42, leading to analyst downgrades due to lost confidence in management [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (FLR) for allegedly concealing significant cost overruns and execution problems on key infrastructure projects, leading to a sharp decline in stock value and investor confidence [1][3][4]. Company Overview - Fluor Corporation, headquartered in Irving, Texas, provides engineering, procurement, construction, and project management services globally, with its Urban Solutions segment being the largest revenue driver among its three segments [2]. Allegations and Issues - The lawsuit claims that FLR concealed cost overruns and execution issues on major projects such as the Gordie Howe International Bridge, I-635/LBJ, and I-35, which were impacted by subcontractor errors, supply chain inflation, and construction delays [3]. - The company allegedly overstated its risk mitigation strategies and failed to disclose the full impact of reduced client spending and macroeconomic uncertainty [3]. Financial Performance - Despite the ongoing issues, FLR reaffirmed its financial guidance in May 2025. However, on August 1, 2025, the company reported second-quarter results that significantly missed expectations, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.43 (missing by $0.13) and revenue of $3.98 billion (missing by $570 million) [4]. - Following these disappointing results, FLR cut its full-year guidance and experienced a stock price drop of 27.04%, closing at $41.42 on August 1, 2025. Analysts subsequently downgraded the stock due to lost confidence in management's disclosures and project oversight [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (FLR) by Berger Montague on behalf of investors who acquired shares between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, due to alleged misrepresentation of the company's financial condition and undisclosed issues with major infrastructure projects [1][3]. Company Overview - Fluor Corporation, headquartered in Irving, Texas, provides engineering, procurement, construction, and project management services globally, with its Urban Solutions segment being the largest revenue contributor [2]. Allegations and Investigation - The investigation focuses on claims that FLR misrepresented its financial health and concealed rising costs and delays in key infrastructure projects, specifically the Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35 projects, which are vital to its Urban Solutions segment [3]. Financial Performance - On August 1, 2025, FLR reported disappointing Q2 2025 results, with earnings per share (EPS) of $0.43 and revenue of $3.98 billion, missing consensus estimates by $0.13 and $570 million, respectively. The company also reduced its full-year forecast, attributing the shortfall to project execution failures and a slowdown in new contract awards. Following this announcement, FLR's stock price fell over 27%, closing at $41.42 on the same day [4]. Market Reaction - In the wake of the disappointing results, several brokerages downgraded FLR's stock, citing significant concerns regarding the company's internal controls and transparency [5].