Cost & Size Comparison - Both Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) are low-cost options, with VNQI having a slightly lower expense ratio of 0.12% compared to REET's 0.14% [3][4] - VNQI has a total assets under management (AUM) of $3.53 billion, while REET has $4.33 billion [3] Performance & Risk Analysis - Over the past year, VNQI has outperformed REET with a return of 19.58% compared to REET's 6.65% [3][9] - In terms of risk, VNQI has a maximum drawdown of -35.76% over five years, while REET's maximum drawdown is -32.09% [5] - The growth of $1,000 invested over five years shows VNQI decreasing to $857, while REET increased to $1,053 [5][11] Portfolio Composition - REET, established in 2014, is the largest global real estate ETF by total assets, holding 377 assets with major positions in Welltower, Prologis, and Equinix, which together account for nearly 20% of its total assets [6] - VNQI focuses exclusively on non-U.S. real estate, primarily in developed international markets, with top holdings including Goodman Group, Mitsui Fudosan, and Mitsubishi Estate [7] - VNQI has a total of 742 holdings, with no single asset exceeding 4% of its weight, indicating a more diversified portfolio compared to REET [7] Dividend Yield & Payout - VNQI offers a higher dividend yield of 4.58% compared to REET's 3.62%, appealing to income-focused investors [3][4] - VNQI pays dividends annually, while REET pays quarterly, with REET having a higher payout ratio of 96% compared to VNQI's lower ratio, indicating a stronger commitment to returning profits to investors [11]

Core Insights - The article compares two global real estate ETFs: FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET), focusing on their cost, performance, risk, and portfolio composition to help investors determine which ETF may better suit their needs [1] Cost & Size - GQRE has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which is three times higher than REET's 0.14% [2][3] - As of January 8, 2026, GQRE has a one-year return of 7.08% and a dividend yield of 4.66%, while REET has a one-year return of 6.65% and a dividend yield of 3.62% [2][3] - GQRE's assets under management (AUM) stand at $342.55 million, significantly lower than REET's $4.33 billion [2] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, GQRE experienced a maximum drawdown of -35.08%, compared to REET's -32.09% [4] - An investment of $1,000 in GQRE would have grown to $1,032 over five years, while the same investment in REET would have grown to $1,053 [4] Portfolio Composition - REET, established in 2014, is the largest global real estate ETF, holding 377 assets, with top positions in Welltower, Prologis, and Equinix, which collectively account for about 20% of its total holdings [5] - GQRE, created in 2013, has 150 total holdings, focusing on higher-quality real estate assets, with its top three holdings being American Tower Corporation, Digital Realty Trust, and Public Storage [6] Investment Strategy - GQRE tracks the Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate Index, selecting securities based on value, momentum, and quality factors, aiming for long-term capital appreciation while mitigating risk [7] - GQRE has outperformed REET in both 12-month and 5-year price gains, with its price approximately 20% higher since inception, while REET's price has only increased by 0.68% since 2014 [8][9]

Core Insights - The article discusses two prominent real estate ETFs, the Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and the Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ), which provide investors with exposure to international real estate markets outside the United States [2][4]. Cost & Size Comparison - HAUZ has an expense ratio of 0.10% and assets under management (AUM) of $951.9 million, while VNQI has an expense ratio of 0.12% and AUM of $3.53 billion [3]. - The one-year return for HAUZ is 21.27%, compared to VNQI's 19.63%, and the dividend yield for HAUZ is 4.34%, slightly lower than VNQI's 4.58% [3][4]. Performance & Risk Metrics - Over a five-year period, HAUZ experienced a maximum drawdown of -34.54%, while VNQI had a slightly higher drawdown of -35.76% [5]. - The growth of a $1,000 investment over five years would result in $891 for HAUZ and $876 for VNQI [5]. Fund Composition - VNQI holds 742 assets and focuses on global real estate excluding the U.S., with major holdings including Goodman Group, Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd., and Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. [6]. - HAUZ, being three years younger, has nearly 300 fewer holdings than VNQI and excludes companies from Pakistan and Vietnam in addition to the U.S. [7]. Dividend Payout Frequency - HAUZ has historically paid dividends semiannually, resulting in two payments per year, while VNQI switched from quarterly to annual payments in 2023, offering a larger lump sum payment [9].

The Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF and the iShares Global REIT ETF both invest worldwide, but their construction determines whether property exposure stays tied to U.S. REIT cycles or expands across global markets.Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) stands out for yield and recent return, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) brings greater scale, liquidity, and U.S. REIT concentration to the real estate ETF space.This comparison looks at HAUZ and REET, two global real estate exchange-tra ...

Key Points RWX charges a much higher expense ratio than REET. RWX focuses on non-U.S. real estate, while REET includes both U.S. and international holdings. REET is larger and more liquid, with a lesser five-year drawdown. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › The iShares Global REIT ETF (NYSEMKT:REET) and SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (NYSEMKT:RWX) differ most in geographic focus and cost, with REET offering broader exposure and lower fees, while RWX concentrat ...

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the iShares Global REIT ETF ( REET ) as an investment option at its current market price. This ETF has an objective to "track theI am a macro-focused investor with 15 years experience working in Financial Services. My niche is finding under-valued sectors and thematic ideas (metals, gold, crypto) at opportune entry points. The first half of my career was in New York, working professionally after college (BS - Finance and D1 Men's Tennis). I relocated to North Carol ...