Peter Mallouk, the billionaire CEO of wealth management firm Creative Planning, says AI isn't like any past technology cycle — it's far more transformational, and that calls for investors to take action in their portfolios. Mallouk told Business Insider that he's convinced AI is more impactful than other technological advancements by a long-shot, and the change it creates will likely be permanent. "I think it's more than the internet, where the internet made everybody more efficient, or Microsoft with all t ...

Cost & Size Comparison - Both Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) are low-cost options, with VNQI having a slightly lower expense ratio of 0.12% compared to REET's 0.14% [3][4] - VNQI has a total assets under management (AUM) of $3.53 billion, while REET has $4.33 billion [3] Performance & Risk Analysis - Over the past year, VNQI has outperformed REET with a return of 19.58% compared to REET's 6.65% [3][9] - In terms of risk, VNQI has a maximum drawdown of -35.76% over five years, while REET's maximum drawdown is -32.09% [5] - The growth of $1,000 invested over five years shows VNQI decreasing to $857, while REET increased to $1,053 [5][11] Portfolio Composition - REET, established in 2014, is the largest global real estate ETF by total assets, holding 377 assets with major positions in Welltower, Prologis, and Equinix, which together account for nearly 20% of its total assets [6] - VNQI focuses exclusively on non-U.S. real estate, primarily in developed international markets, with top holdings including Goodman Group, Mitsui Fudosan, and Mitsubishi Estate [7] - VNQI has a total of 742 holdings, with no single asset exceeding 4% of its weight, indicating a more diversified portfolio compared to REET [7] Dividend Yield & Payout - VNQI offers a higher dividend yield of 4.58% compared to REET's 3.62%, appealing to income-focused investors [3][4] - VNQI pays dividends annually, while REET pays quarterly, with REET having a higher payout ratio of 96% compared to VNQI's lower ratio, indicating a stronger commitment to returning profits to investors [11]

Core Insights - The article compares two global real estate ETFs: FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET), focusing on their cost, performance, risk, and portfolio composition to help investors determine which ETF may better suit their needs [1] Cost & Size - GQRE has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which is three times higher than REET's 0.14% [2][3] - As of January 8, 2026, GQRE has a one-year return of 7.08% and a dividend yield of 4.66%, while REET has a one-year return of 6.65% and a dividend yield of 3.62% [2][3] - GQRE's assets under management (AUM) stand at $342.55 million, significantly lower than REET's $4.33 billion [2] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, GQRE experienced a maximum drawdown of -35.08%, compared to REET's -32.09% [4] - An investment of $1,000 in GQRE would have grown to $1,032 over five years, while the same investment in REET would have grown to $1,053 [4] Portfolio Composition - REET, established in 2014, is the largest global real estate ETF, holding 377 assets, with top positions in Welltower, Prologis, and Equinix, which collectively account for about 20% of its total holdings [5] - GQRE, created in 2013, has 150 total holdings, focusing on higher-quality real estate assets, with its top three holdings being American Tower Corporation, Digital Realty Trust, and Public Storage [6] Investment Strategy - GQRE tracks the Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate Index, selecting securities based on value, momentum, and quality factors, aiming for long-term capital appreciation while mitigating risk [7] - GQRE has outperformed REET in both 12-month and 5-year price gains, with its price approximately 20% higher since inception, while REET's price has only increased by 0.68% since 2014 [8][9]

Core Insights - The article discusses two prominent real estate ETFs, the Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and the Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ), which provide investors with exposure to international real estate markets outside the United States [2][4]. Cost & Size Comparison - HAUZ has an expense ratio of 0.10% and assets under management (AUM) of $951.9 million, while VNQI has an expense ratio of 0.12% and AUM of $3.53 billion [3]. - The one-year return for HAUZ is 21.27%, compared to VNQI's 19.63%, and the dividend yield for HAUZ is 4.34%, slightly lower than VNQI's 4.58% [3][4]. Performance & Risk Metrics - Over a five-year period, HAUZ experienced a maximum drawdown of -34.54%, while VNQI had a slightly higher drawdown of -35.76% [5]. - The growth of a $1,000 investment over five years would result in $891 for HAUZ and $876 for VNQI [5]. Fund Composition - VNQI holds 742 assets and focuses on global real estate excluding the U.S., with major holdings including Goodman Group, Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd., and Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. [6]. - HAUZ, being three years younger, has nearly 300 fewer holdings than VNQI and excludes companies from Pakistan and Vietnam in addition to the U.S. [7]. Dividend Payout Frequency - HAUZ has historically paid dividends semiannually, resulting in two payments per year, while VNQI switched from quarterly to annual payments in 2023, offering a larger lump sum payment [9].

Core Insights - The Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and the iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) provide different exposures to global real estate markets, with HAUZ focusing on international markets outside the U.S. and REET being more concentrated in U.S. REITs [1][10] Cost and Size Comparison - HAUZ has a lower expense ratio of 0.10% compared to REET's 0.14% - HAUZ offers a 1-year return of 17.2% versus REET's 3.6% - HAUZ has a dividend yield of 3.91%, slightly higher than REET's 3.7% - HAUZ's assets under management (AUM) stand at $940.7 million, while REET has a significantly larger AUM of $4.04 billion [3][4] Performance and Risk Metrics - Over the past five years, HAUZ experienced a maximum drawdown of 34.53%, while REET had a lower drawdown of 32.09% - An investment of $1,000 would have grown to $883 in HAUZ and $1,053 in REET over the same period [5] Underlying Holdings - REET tracks a global index with 328 stocks, heavily weighted towards large U.S. REITs like Welltower Inc, Prologis Reit Inc, and Equinix Reit Inc, which dominate its performance [6][9] - HAUZ holds 408 stocks, with significant investments in companies like Goodman Group, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd, and Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd, providing a more geographically diversified exposure [7] Investment Implications - REET is suitable for investors seeking exposure closely tied to U.S. real estate dynamics, while HAUZ is better for those wanting to diversify away from U.S. market influences [10]

Core Insights - The iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (RWX) differ primarily in geographic focus and cost, with REET providing broader exposure and lower fees compared to RWX, which focuses on international assets [2][3] Cost & Size Comparison - REET has an expense ratio of 0.14% and an AUM of $4.0 billion, while RWX has a higher expense ratio of 0.59% and an AUM of $295.7 million [4][5] - The one-year return for REET is 7.6%, whereas RWX has a significantly higher return of 25.5% [4] - REET offers a dividend yield of 3.71%, compared to RWX's yield of 3.36% [5] Performance & Risk Metrics - Over five years, REET has a maximum drawdown of -32.1%, while RWX has a higher drawdown of -35.9% [6] - An investment of $1,000 in REET would grow to $1,254 over five years, compared to $1,032 for RWX [6] Fund Composition - RWX focuses on international real estate, holding 119 companies, with top positions in Mitsui Fudosan Co. Ltd., Scentre Group, and Swiss Prime Site Reg [7] - REET includes 326 holdings, with major positions in Welltower Inc., Prologis REIT Inc., and Equinix REIT Inc., providing a more representative global REIT portfolio [8] Historical Performance - Since 2014, REET has delivered annualized total returns of 3.8%, significantly outperforming RWX's 0.7% [10]

Core Viewpoint - The article evaluates the iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) as a potential investment option at its current market price, focusing on its objective to track global real estate investment trusts [1]. Group 1: Investment Strategy - The ETF aims to provide exposure to the global real estate market, which can be beneficial for investors looking for diversification and income generation [1]. - The article emphasizes the importance of macro-focused investment strategies, highlighting the potential for finding undervalued sectors and thematic ideas [1]. Group 2: Market Context - The author discusses the broader market context, mentioning various investment vehicles such as DIA, VOO, QQQM, and sector-specific ETFs like XLE and VPU, indicating a diverse investment approach [1]. - The article also references alternative investments, including Bitcoin and gold, suggesting a comprehensive strategy that includes both traditional and non-traditional assets [1]. Group 3: Income Generation - The article notes that the managed income portfolios target safe and reliable yields of approximately 8%, appealing to both active and passive investors [1]. - It highlights the advantage of monthly-paying holdings for faster compounding and steady income streams, which is a key consideration for income-focused investors [1].