Financial Data and Key Metrics - Sales decreased by 10.3% YoY to 293.2millioninQ1,primarilydrivenbya9.913.2 million (4.5% of sales) compared to 17.3million(5.35.9 million, down from 8.8millionYoY,withdilutedEPSat0.19 compared to 0.28intheprioryear[10]−AdjusteddilutedEPS(non−GAAP)was0.22, compared to 0.31inQ1offiscal2024[10]BusinessLinePerformance−Tireunitsweredown5120 million in operating cash flow [12] Other Important Information - The company generated 26millionincashfromoperationsinQ1,reducingthecashconversioncycleby15daysYoY[11]−Netbankdebtstoodat93 million, with a net bank debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 0.7x and total liquidity of 477million[11]−Capitalexpendituresforfiscal2025areexpectedtobebetween25 million and $35 million [13] Q&A Session Summary Question: What drove the significant improvement in sales, particularly in June? - The improvement was driven by promotional activities in the tire category, supported by manufacturer-funded promotions, which led to unit growth in June [15][16][19] Question: How did price versus unit or traffic impact Q1 comps? - Price was slightly up, but traffic was significantly down, with June showing flat units and ticket in the tire category [23] Question: What is the strategy for oil price promotions? - The strategy is managed discounting, focusing on providing value to consumers and ensuring quick service turnaround [24] Question: How did gross margin performance compare to internal expectations? - Gross margin exceeded expectations, driven by strong technician productivity and lower labor and material costs [28][29] Question: What are the gross margin expectations for Q2? - The company expects similar gross margin results on a rate basis, with a target of 37% for Q2 [30] Question: What drove the weaker July comps compared to June? - The weaker comps were attributed to a soft comparison period, with no significant underlying issues [32]