Workflow
Cibus(CBUS) - 2024 Q3 - Earnings Call Transcript
CibusCibus(US:CBUS)2024-11-09 18:38

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Cash and cash equivalents were $28.8 million as of September 30, 2024, with expectations that existing cash will fund planned operating expenses through the first quarter of 2025 [37] - R&D expense decreased to $13 million for Q3 2024 from $70.5 million in the same period last year, primarily due to lower noncash stock compensation and strategic realignment [38] - Net loss increased to $201.5 million for Q3 2024 compared to a net loss of $34.5 million in the prior year, largely due to impairment of goodwill [39] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is transitioning from an R&D-focused business to a commercial gene editing company, emphasizing the launch of herbicide-resistant traits in rice and Pod Shatter Reduction traits in canola [8][10] - The Trait Machine process has enabled the completion of edits on elite germplasm and regeneration to a plant within 12 months, significantly accelerating the commercialization timeline [11][12] - The company has established collaborations with major seed companies for trait development, licensing, and commercialization, validating its technology as a commercial platform [16][18] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company anticipates a market opportunity of approximately $200 million in potential annual royalties from rice traits, with an additional $150 million from expanding into Asia starting in 2030 [28][29] - The ongoing field trials for Pod Shatter Reduction in canola and winter oilseed rape are key elements for commercialization, with initial successful trials completed [31] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to operationalize the Trait Machine process to develop a multi-trait pipeline, focusing on commercializing plant traits that enhance productivity and sustainability [9][10] - The strategic focus includes expanding the rice platform and developing the soybean platform, with expectations for operational capabilities by the end of 2024 [35][36] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management highlighted the importance of gene editing in addressing global food security challenges and emphasized the company's leadership in the agricultural gene editing industry [23][24] - The company is optimistic about the regulatory environment, with positive movements in Europe and Asia regarding gene editing policies [42][44] Other Important Information - The company has made significant advancements in gene editing capabilities, particularly in developing traits for disease resistance and herbicide tolerance [33][34] - The Trait Machine process is expected to provide a competitive advantage by enabling faster and more efficient trait development compared to traditional breeding methods [72][73] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you discuss the state of legislative or policy support for gene editing? - Management noted that the Americas are well-positioned, while Europe is expected to make progress with new leadership in early 2025 [43][45] Question: What is the timeline for rice commercial revenues? - Expected launches for rice traits in Latin America by 2026-2027 and in the U.S. by 2027-2028 [48][49] Question: How differentiated is the company's solution compared to competitors? - Management emphasized the speed and efficiency of the Trait Machine process, which allows for quicker returns of edited germplasm to customers [55][56] Question: What is the cost-sharing structure for field trials? - Currently, the company is covering initial costs, but expects a shift to a more profitable cost-sharing model by 2026 [60][61] Question: Can you provide updates on the Sclerotinia resistance trials? - Positive results were reported from field trials, with greenhouse results expected in Q4 [62][63] Question: How does the Trait Machine differentiate from competitors' processes? - The Trait Machine allows for complex edits within a single cell, leading to faster and more efficient trait development compared to traditional methods [72][73]