Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - In 2024, adjusted EBITDA was 239million,withadjustednetincomereportedat21 million or 0.37pershare[7][27]−Fourth−quarteradjustedEBITDAwas11 million, with a loss of 43millionor0.79 per share [27] - The refining segment reported an adjusted EBITDA loss of 22millioninthefourthquartercomparedtoanadjustedEBITDAof20 million in the third quarter [28] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The retail segment achieved adjusted EBITDA of 22millioninthefourthquarter,upfrom21 million in the third quarter, driven by expanding fuel margins and lower operating costs in Hawaii [34] - The logistics segment reported a record fourth-quarter adjusted EBITDA of 33million,attributedtohighersystemutilizationinHawaiiandloweroperatingcostsinMontana[34]MarketDataandKeyMetricsChanges−Hawaiithroughputwasstrongat83,000barrelsperday,withproductioncostsat4.42 per barrel [19] - Washington throughput was 39,000 barrels per day, with production costs at 4.34perbarrel[19]−Wyomingthroughputwas14,000barrelsperday,withproductioncostsat11.49 per barrel [20] - Montana throughput was 52,000 barrels per day, with production costs at 10.48perbarrel[21]CompanyStrategyandDevelopmentDirection−Thecompanyisfocusedonexecutingkeyprojectstoenhanceearningspower,includingtheMontanaFCCandAlkyturnaroundandthestartupoftheHawaiiSAFunitinthesecondhalfof2025[14][15]−Thecompanyaimstomaintainastrongbalancesheettosupportstrategicobjectivesandinvestthroughrefiningcycles,havingrepurchasednearlyfivemillionsharesor9250 million of common stock, allowing for opportunistic repurchases [38] Q&A Session Summary Question: Share repurchase authorization and balance considerations - Management indicated that the reauthorization opens additional capacity for share repurchases, with a dynamic approach to balancing repurchases versus debt reduction [41][42] Question: Confidence in the SAF project in Hawaii - Management highlighted low operating costs and logistical advantages as key factors for confidence in the SAF project, which is expected to have flexibility in monetizing the product [44][46][49] Question: Turnaround work at Wyoming and ramp-up details - Management confirmed opportunities to pull work scope forward but noted that some catalyst life issues may still necessitate a planned outage in 2026 [54][56] Question: Monetizing the Laramie asset - Management acknowledged increased interest in the gas market and emphasized the importance of maximizing unitholder value while considering the asset's non-core status [60][61] Question: Insurance coverage for the Wyoming outage - Management stated that adequate property and PI coverage is in place, with lost profits dependent on market responses [65][68] Question: Diverging trends in Hawaii and Washington capture - Management noted strong performance in Hawaii driven by clean product freight, while Washington faced challenges due to weak asphalt demand and overall market conditions [71][74] Question: M&A opportunities - Management indicated a focus on internal execution rather than acquisitions, with a high bar for any potential M&A opportunities given current market conditions [76][77] Question: West Coast supply dynamics - Management confirmed that the Washington index improved by $7 in February and discussed potential tightness in the West Coast market due to maintenance schedules [80][84]