Workflow
跟踪基准下,哪些行业配置价值更高?
2025-05-21 15:14

Summary of Conference Call Records Industry or Company Involved - Public Fund Industry Core Points and Arguments - The expansion of public fund scale is significantly correlated with excess returns, especially in favorable market years. However, current challenges in share and scale growth are evident, with a redemption rate of approximately 10% in Q4 and 2-3% in Q1 of the current year [1][2][3] - Adjusting to narrow-based indices (such as consumption, manufacturing, TMT) can improve the probability of outperforming benchmarks, but the win rate remains below 50%. Over the past three years, more than half of narrow-based index products failed to outperform benchmarks, indicating limited effectiveness of this strategy for excess returns [1][3] - In bond funds, a lower bond content and higher stock content correlate with increased difficulty in outperforming benchmarks. The significantly lower allocation to financial and cyclical sectors compared to index weights is a key factor, with potential for future weight increases in these sectors [1][3] - Achieving relative returns under new regulations requires attention to the stability of style and industry exposure, enhancing style and industry allocations to improve portfolio performance while controlling volatility. Industry-led investments have high potential for excess returns, but the risk-reward ratio is declining, making it a suboptimal strategy [1][3][4] - For absolute returns, multi-asset allocation can simplify investment processes. Relative returns require clarity on the stability of various benchmarks' style and industry exposures, along with methods to enhance these while controlling volatility [4] Other Important but Possibly Overlooked Content - Public funds should allocate at least half of their positions to benchmark indices and use the other half to seek excess returns, regardless of whether through style or industry allocation. Financial sectors, particularly non-bank and bank stocks, are notably underweighted in public funds compared to their index allocations [10][14] - The risk control benchmark can be compared to index-enhanced products, with the median risk of these products showing a relative drawdown of about 10%. If actively managed equity products can achieve a 10% relative drawdown with higher annualized excess returns, they will outperform traditional ETFs and broad index products [5][6] - The probability of selecting industries that yield over 1% excess returns annually is low, typically around 10%, with a special case in 2021 where 30% of industries met this standard. Achieving 10% excess returns is considered a high target for public funds [9][14] - The distinction between using style versus industry for excess returns is significant; style offers stability but lower ceilings, while industry can achieve higher ceilings but with less stability in win rates [11][14]