
Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - In Q1 2025, net sales were $227 million, a decrease of $14 million compared to Q1 2024, attributed to various factors including operational decisions [18] - The average sales price per gallon increased to $1.93 in Q1 2025 from $1.86 in Q1 2024, reflecting improved domestic market prices for ethanol [18] - Adjusted EBITDA improved to negative $4.4 million from negative $7.1 million in Q1 2024, indicating operational improvements [20] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company sold 89.6 million gallons in Q1 2025, down from 99 million gallons in Q1 2024, due to idling the Magic Valley facility [18] - ISCC certified renewable fuel sales increased, providing a $1.4 million benefit from premium pricing compared to domestic renewable fuel sales [19] - The Columbia facility's performance improved by $2.9 million compared to Q1 2024, benefiting from the integration of Alto Carbonic [28] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Seasonal market patterns in 2025 showed improved crush margins each month during Q1, although high inventory levels limited margin expansion [12] - The company noted that without a significant reduction in ethanol supply, substantial improvements in crush spreads may be constrained [13] - The recent E15 fuel waiver by the EPA is expected to positively impact ethanol demand, particularly in California [14][15] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on diversifying revenue streams and mitigating commodity volatility through initiatives in beverage-grade CO2 and ISCC renewable fuel [23][24] - Regulatory developments, such as the potential national adoption of year-round E15, are seen as opportunities for industry growth [25] - The company is actively evaluating alternatives for revenue streams and optimizing its operations to drive long-term shareholder value [25] Management Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about margin improvements with increased demand expected from the summer driving season, despite concerns over tariffs and export uncertainties [13] - The company is assessing the long-term impact of Illinois legislation on CO2 sequestration and is working with state leaders to address potential legal challenges [17] - Management highlighted the importance of optimizing feedstock sourcing to improve the viability of the Magic Valley facility in the future [46] Other Important Information - The company expects to save approximately $8 million annually from workforce reductions, with benefits starting in Q2 2025 [8][29] - A temporary load dock was damaged due to rising river levels, impacting production and logistics, with ongoing assessments for long-term remediation [11][35] Q&A Session Summary Question: Was the acquisition of the liquid CO2 facility accretive during the first quarter? - Yes, the integration of the Columbia facility and Carbonic has already shown significant positive benefits, improving operations by $2.9 million compared to Q1 2024 [27][28] Question: Will the $8 million in annual savings come from operating expenses or cost of goods sold? - The savings will come from a 13% reduction in both cost of goods sold and SG&A expenses, expected to be realized in Q2 2025 [29] Question: What impact might the Illinois bill have on CO2 sequestration plans? - The bill could require relocating drilling sites, which would necessitate amending existing permits [30][32] Question: What was the estimated cost of the temporary solution for the damaged load dock? - The company is currently assessing long-term remediation options and working with insurance to mitigate financial impacts [35] Question: What conditions would justify a restart at the Magic Valley facility? - Significant changes in corn prices and feedstock sourcing would need to occur for a restart to be considered viable [46]