Crescent Energy Co(CRGY) - 2025 Q2 - Earnings Call Transcript

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Crescent Energy reported record production of 263,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, with 108,000 barrels of oil per day, generating approximately $171 million of free cash flow for the quarter, all exceeding Wall Street expectations [7][14] - The company achieved approximately $514 million of adjusted EBITDA and $265 million of capital expenditures, continuing a strong track record of free cash flow generation [14] - The company has generated cumulative free cash flow roughly equal to its current market cap over the last five years, indicating a compelling discount on free cash flow metrics [14] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The Eagle Ford operations are delivering on a flexible capital program, focusing on gas activity in the latter half of the year, while maintaining a prudent approach in Utah to capture long-term resource opportunities [9][10] - Operational efficiencies have improved well costs by approximately 15% in both the Eagle Ford and Uinta basins since last year, contributing to enhanced production expectations and reduced capital [8][9] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The A and D market was quieter in Q2 with continued commodity price volatility, but the company successfully identified compelling value opportunities for both acquisitions and divestitures [10][12] - The company acquired attractive minerals assets expected to generate returns exceeding the 2x MOIC target, while divesting non-operated assets to streamline the business [11][12] Company Strategy and Development Direction - Crescent Energy is focused on driving long-term value through operational excellence, capital efficiency, and a consistent hedge program to generate durable free cash flow [5][6] - The company is transitioning to a single share class to simplify its stock structure and enhance shareholder value [7][14] - The management emphasizes a proactive approach to capital allocation, balancing debt repayment, dividends, and share buybacks [15][33] Management Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in navigating market volatility and highlighted the importance of operational execution in delivering strong results [5][6] - The company is optimistic about future opportunities, particularly in the Eagle Ford and Uinta basins, and is committed to maximizing free cash flow and returns on capital [9][10] - Management acknowledged the current dislocation in the A and D market, indicating a cautious yet opportunistic approach to acquisitions [38] Other Important Information - The company repurchased approximately $28 million worth of stock at a weighted average price of $7.88, roughly 12% below the current share price, as part of its buyback program [15] - Crescent Energy paid down approximately $200 million of debt this quarter, increasing liquidity to $1 billion [15] Q&A Session Summary Question: Efficiency gains on D and C per foot - Management attributed the efficiency gains to the execution of best practices, particularly the implementation of simul frac in completion operations [21] Question: Capital allocation decisions in Uinta - Management indicated excitement about the resource potential in Uinta and plans to allocate capital prudently based on proven economic inventory [24] Question: Justification for adding to the minerals portfolio - Management emphasized that the acquisition aligns with their strategy and is expected to be highly cash flow accretive [29] Question: Balance sheet and capital allocation - Management confirmed that 80% of free cash flow is directed towards debt repayment, with the remaining 20% allocated to dividends and buybacks [33] Question: Dislocation in the A and D market - Management noted that many asset sale processes were pulled due to volatility, indicating a functioning market with opportunities for strategic transactions [38] Question: Comparison of returns between Uinta and Eagle Ford - Management stated that both areas have similar capital allocation potential, but Uinta has more stacked resources that require careful evaluation before further development [70]