Sotherly Hotels(US:SOHO)2025-08-12 15:00Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - For the second quarter, total revenue was approximately $48.8 million, representing a decrease of 3.7% compared to the same quarter in 2024 [15] - Year-to-date total revenue was approximately $97.1 million, reflecting a decrease of 0.1% from the same period last year [16] - Hotel EBITDA for the quarter was approximately $13.9 million, a decrease of 11.5% from the same quarter in 2024 [16] - Year-to-date hotel EBITDA was approximately $26.8 million, representing a decrease of 4.4% over the same period last year [16] - Adjusted FFO for the quarter was approximately $4.8 million, a decrease of approximately $2.7 million from the same quarter in 2024 [16] - Year-to-date adjusted FFO was approximately $9.3 million, a decrease of $3.4 million from the same period last year [16] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Composite portfolio RevPAR decreased by 5.4% driven by a 3.5% decrease in occupancy and a 1.9% decrease in ADR [6] - Stripping out Tampa, the composite portfolio RevPAR decreased by 5% compared to the prior year, driven by a 2.3% decrease in occupancy and a 2.8% decrease in ADR [6] - Hotel Ballast in Wilmington posted a RevPAR increase of 1.3% year over year, driven by a 2.7% gain in average rate [10] - The Hyde Beach House delivered a RevPAR increase of 12.7%, driven by an 18.5% gain in occupancy [12] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Savannah saw an outsized impact during the quarter with RevPAR down nearly 10% year over year [23] - Group booking pace for the remainder of the year remains intact with only minor reductions compared to 2024 [21] - In Arlington, second quarter group revenue increased by 42% over the prior year [24] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company remains focused on disciplined cost management and targeted revenue strategies to navigate the challenging operating environment [9] - The company is proactively managing upcoming debt maturities and is confident in its ability to work constructively with lending partners [14] - The company anticipates full year 2025 RevPAR for the actual portfolio to be approximately flat compared to last year [28] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management noted that the portfolio underperformed expectations due to growing economic uncertainty and softening demand [7] - There is confidence in the long-term fundamentals of the Savannah market, expecting performance to recover as macro pressures ease [23] - Management expressed cautious optimism about the overall trajectory of the lodging industry despite elevated interest rates and persistent inflationary pressures [27] Other Important Information - The company had total cash of approximately $26.5 million as of June 30, 2025, with $10.5 million in unrestricted cash [18] - The company anticipates routine capital expenditures for the replacement and refurbishment of furniture fixtures and equipment to amount to approximately $7.1 million for calendar year 2025 [19] Q&A Session Summary Question: Why was Savannah the hardest hit hotel in the quarter? - Management clarified that Savannah had significant negative impacts due to a decline in transient travel and a surprising amount of government business affected by funding cuts [34][36] Question: What percentage of the portfolio is government-related business? - Management indicated that government-related business is likely in the high single digits, with some group bookings indirectly tied to government funding [38][40] Question: Does the guidance reduction reflect further government-related pullback? - Management stated that the guidance reflects the most recent forecast for the entire year based on current trends [42] Question: Are there plans for other asset sales? - Management confirmed that they are always looking at options for asset sales, including parking lots or other tangential assets [48] Question: Why is the mortgage market for hotels still challenged? - Management explained that lenders are cautious due to high debt yields and tougher debt service coverage ratios compared to pre-pandemic levels [50][52]