
Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - For Q4 2022, comparable hotel adjusted EBITDA was 175.7 million over 2021, surpassing pre-pandemic 2019 levels by 257 million in the quarter, an increase of nearly 23% over the comparable period in 2021 [127] - Comparable RevPAR for the portfolio in Q4 was 15.5 million more profit than in 2019 [131] - The company is positioned to benefit from a balanced portfolio of leisure, group, and business demand segments, with a projected earnings mix of 60% from urban markets and over 40% from resort markets in 2023 [126] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in closing the occupancy gap to 2019 levels, particularly in urban hotels, with significant momentum expected in 2023 [120] - The company anticipates some challenges to profit growth margins due to rising property taxes, insurance costs, and staffing wages, but remains optimistic about travel demand [134] - The outlook for 2023 is constructive, with expectations for record comparable total revenues and hotel adjusted EBITDA [119][134] Other Important Information - The company repurchased 1.6 million shares at an average price of 600 million in liquidity, providing a balance sheet advantage for opportunistic capital allocation [126] - The company was named the hotel sector leader in the Americas by GRESB for the third consecutive year, with new environmental and social targets set for 2030 [112] Q&A Session Summary Question: What gives confidence in closing the occupancy gap to 2019? - Management indicated that the majority of gains are expected in occupancy, particularly at urban hotels, with January showing a 15.8% increase compared to last year [120] Question: How are leisure rates being underwritten for 2023? - The approach to underwriting leisure rates is market-specific, with expectations of strong performance in key markets like Vail and Sonoma [140] Question: What are the expectations for margins in 2023? - Management expects high single-digit expense increases, indicating that flat GOP margins would be considered a success [24][146]