Core Viewpoint - Blue Owl Capital Corporation II's Board of Directors unanimously recommends shareholders reject the unsolicited minority tender offer from Cox Capital Partners and Saba Capital Management, citing the offer's significant discount to net asset value (NAV) and the ongoing capital return initiatives already in place [1]. Group 1: Offer Details - The unsolicited tender offer involves up to 8,000,000 shares for approximately $30 million, representing less than 7% of the outstanding shares [1]. - The offer price reflects a discount of approximately 33.2% to the NAV, which the Board believes undervalues the long-term potential of OBDC II shares [1]. - The Board has advised shareholders to simply not respond to any offer materials received to reject the tender offer [1]. Group 2: Reasons to Reject the Offer - Tendering shares would prevent shareholders from receiving future distributions and appreciating the value of their shares [1]. - The offer price is deemed inadequate and arbitrary, significantly undervaluing OBDC II's assets and liquidity access [1]. - BofA Securities provided an opinion stating the offer price is inadequate from a financial perspective for OBDC II shareholders [1][2]. Group 3: Company Performance and Future Plans - OBDC II has delivered a 9.1% annualized return since inception, outperforming leveraged loan indices [1]. - Shareholders are expected to receive payments equal to 50% or more of OBDC II's net assets in 2026, including a return of capital distribution of 30% of NAV to be paid by March 31, 2026 [1]. - The company plans to prioritize additional return of capital distributions on a quarterly basis of 5% or more, alongside regular monthly dividends [1].

Core Viewpoint - An urgent investigation has been launched into Blue Owl Capital Inc. regarding potential breaches of fiduciary duties by its officers and directors, which may have resulted in damages to the company and its shareholders [1] Group 1: Investigation Details - Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP is conducting the investigation led by Attorney Joseph A. Pettigrew [1] - The focus of the investigation is to determine if Blue Owl's management acted in an acceptable manner [1] Group 2: Company Impact - The investigation raises concerns about the potential damages suffered by Blue Owl and its shareholders [1] - On February 19, 2026, Blue Owl announced its decision to liquidate, which may be linked to the management issues under scrutiny [1]

Core Viewpoint - Labrador Gold Corp. has received a recommendation from Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) for shareholders to vote exclusively on the BLUE Proxy in support of the company's resolutions during the upcoming Annual General and Special Meeting on February 24, 2026 [1][7]. Group 1: Proxy Voting Recommendations - ISS advises shareholders to vote "FOR" all of LabGold's resolutions and "AGAINST"/"WITHHOLD" on the resolutions proposed by the Dissident, Coloured Ties Capital Inc. [1][3] - The deadline for shareholders to submit their votes on the BLUE Proxy is February 20, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. (Toronto time) [16]. Group 2: ISS's Analysis of the Dissident's Case - ISS concluded that the Dissident has not presented a compelling case for change, noting that criticisms regarding the sale of Kingsway and NFG shares rely on hindsight assumptions about metals prices [4]. - The Dissident's campaign lacks essential elements of thoughtful activism, such as a clear plan and qualifications for management nominees [4]. Group 3: Support for LabGold's Strategy - ISS supports LabGold's hybrid mining/investment model, which allows for continued exploration and diversification through minority positions [5]. - The proposed change of business is seen as a better path forward compared to the status quo, despite inherent risks [5]. Group 4: Company Overview and Projects - Labrador Gold Corp. is focused on acquiring and exploring gold projects in Eastern Canada, with significant potential in critical minerals [12]. - The Watson Project, a joint venture with Nemo Resources Inc., represents the largest landholding in the Fort Hope Greenstone Belt, which is underexplored compared to other regions [13]. - The Hopedale property and Borden Lake project also show potential for gold and other minerals, with ongoing exploration efforts identifying various anomalies [14][15].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Blue Owl Capital Inc. during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on February 2, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Blue Owl securities between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by February 2, 2026 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements since 2013 [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Blue Owl made false or misleading statements regarding its asset base and liquidity issues, which were not disclosed to investors [5]. - It is claimed that Blue Owl faced pressure from business development companies (BDCs) redemptions, leading to potential limitations or halts on redemptions, which were downplayed in public statements [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Blue Owl Capital Inc. securities between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on February 2, 2026, for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Blue Owl securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by February 2, 2026 [2] - The lawsuit alleges that Blue Owl made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant liquidity issues and pressures from business development companies (BDCs) [4] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3] - The firm has achieved notable settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and has been ranked highly for securities class action settlements since 2013 [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [3]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Blue Owl Capital Inc. during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on February 2, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Blue Owl securities between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6]. - The lawsuit claims that Blue Owl made false or misleading statements regarding its asset base and liquidity issues, which led to investor damages when the truth was revealed [5]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019, and has been recognized as a leader in the field of securities class action litigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Blue Owl Capital Inc. during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on February 2, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Blue Owl securities between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025, may be entitled to compensation through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6]. - The lead plaintiff must file a motion with the Court by February 2, 2026, to represent other class members [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may lack the necessary experience [4]. - Rosen Law Firm has a history of significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Blue Owl made false or misleading statements regarding its asset base and liquidity issues, which were not disclosed to investors [5]. - It is claimed that Blue Owl faced pressure from business development companies (BDCs) and was likely to limit or halt redemptions, which was not communicated to investors [5].

Core Viewpoint - Blue Moon Metals Inc. is set to begin trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol "BMM" on January 26, 2026, marking a significant milestone for the company and enhancing its visibility among global investors [1][2][3] Company Developments - The company will continue trading on the TSXV under "MOON" and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under "8SX0," while ceasing trading on the OTCQX under "BMOOF" [1] - Peter Madsen has been appointed to the Board of Directors, effective with the Nasdaq listing, bringing over 40 years of financial market experience [3] Strategic Objectives - The Nasdaq listing is expected to support Blue Moon's growth and long-term strategic objectives, particularly in the U.S. market [2][3] - The company's growth strategy includes the acquisition of the Springer processing plant in Nevada, which will process high-grade ores from the Blue Moon Mine in California [3] - Blue Moon aims to acquire additional high-grade critical metals underground mines in the Western United States to enhance its operational capacity [3] Shareholder Engagement - With Oaktree Capital Management and Hartree Partners LP as major shareholders, the company anticipates significant growth in U.S. shareholder base and liquidity improvements in 2026 [3] Project Overview - Blue Moon is advancing three brownfield polymetallic projects: the Nussir project and NSG project in Norway, and the Blue Moon project in the U.S., all of which are strategically located with existing infrastructure [4] - Zinc and copper are identified as critical metals essential to the global economy and national security [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Blue Owl Capital Inc. securities between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on February 2, 2026, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Blue Owl securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by February 2, 2026 [2]. - The lawsuit alleges that Blue Owl made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant liquidity issues and pressures from business development companies (BDCs) [4]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own success in recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements, achieving the largest settlement against a Chinese company and ranking highly in the number of settlements since 2013 [3]. Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit claims that Blue Owl faced undisclosed liquidity issues due to BDC redemptions, which led to a potential limitation or halt of redemptions, thereby misleading investors about the company's true operational status [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Blue Owl Capital Inc. during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on February 2, 2026, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Blue Owl securities between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must act by the lead plaintiff deadline to represent other class members [2]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own success in this area [3]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, and has consistently ranked highly in terms of settlements recovered for investors [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Blue Owl made false or misleading statements regarding its asset base and liquidity issues, which were not disclosed to investors [4]. - It is claimed that these misrepresentations led to damages for investors when the true situation was revealed [4].