Core Viewpoint - Cepton, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit alleging that it misled investors regarding its acquisition by Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd., which may have deprived shareholders of a better offer [2][4]. Company Overview - Cepton, Inc. was focused on high-performance lidar technologies aimed at enhancing safety and autonomy in the Automotive and Smart Infrastructure markets prior to its merger with Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd. [1]. Acquisition Details - Koito announced a bid to acquire Cepton for $3.17 per share in cash, with the transaction closing on January 7, 2025 [3]. Allegations in the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that Cepton failed to disclose a credible third-party bid that valued the company at more than double the Koito acquisition price [4]. - It is alleged that Cepton's Board of Directors did not adequately explore this third-party offer and did not disclose its terms when recommending the Koito acquisition to shareholders [4]. - As a result, shareholders were allegedly deprived of the opportunity to make an informed decision regarding the acquisition [4]. Class Action Participation - Shareholders interested in participating as lead plaintiffs in the class action must file their papers by December 8, 2025 [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers or sellers of Cepton, Inc. common stock during the specified Class Period from July 29, 2024, to January 6, 2025, due to alleged misleading statements made by the company's defendants [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit has already been filed, and individuals wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by December 8, 2025 [1][3]. - Investors who bought or sold Cepton, Inc. common stock during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - The lawsuit claims that Cepton's defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's business and operations, including failing to disclose a credible third-party bid that valued Cepton at more than double the Koito Acquisition [5]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in recovering significant amounts for investors [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its performance in securities class action settlements, including securing over $438 million for investors in 2019 alone [4].

Core Points - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cepton, Inc. by Berger Montague PC on behalf of investors who traded Cepton shares between July 29, 2024, and January 6, 2025 [1][2] - The lawsuit alleges that Cepton's leadership failed to disclose a third-party offer that valued the company at more than double the price of the merger proposal from Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd. [3] - The complaint also claims that Cepton's CEO, Jun Pei, had conflicts of interest that affected the Board's decision-making process [4] Company Overview - Cepton, Inc. is a lidar technology company based in San Jose, California, and was acquired by Koito in January 2025, after which its stock is no longer publicly traded [2] Legal Context - Investors have until December 8, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action [2] - The truth about Cepton's situation was revealed through documents from a Delaware lawsuit that became public in September 2025 [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cepton, Inc. for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and compliance policies during the Class Period from July 29, 2024, to January 6, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Cepton received a credible third-party bid valuing the company at more than double the Koito Acquisition, which was not disclosed to shareholders [5]. - It is alleged that Cepton's Board of Directors failed to adequately explore this offer and did not disclose its terms when recommending the Koito Acquisition to shareholders [5]. - As a result, shareholders were deprived of the opportunity to meaningfully consider the acquisition, leading to materially false and misleading public statements by the defendants [5]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors who purchased or sold Cepton, Inc. common stock during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To join the class action, interested parties can visit the provided link or contact the law firm directly for more information [3][6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action has been filed against Cepton, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding its acquisition by Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd. [1][2] Allegations - The complaint claims that Cepton did not disclose a credible third-party bid that valued the company at more than double the acquisition price offered by Koito, which was $3.17 per share [3] - It is alleged that Cepton's Board of Directors failed to adequately explore this third-party offer and did not disclose its terms when recommending the Koito acquisition to shareholders [3] - As a result, shareholders were deprived of the opportunity to make an informed decision regarding the acquisition [3] Class Action Participation - Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiffs must file their papers by December 8, 2025, and can remain absent class members if they choose not to participate [4] - The representation in the class action is on a contingency fee basis, meaning shareholders will not incur any fees or expenses [5]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cepton, Inc. for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and compliance policies during the Class Period from July 29, 2024, to January 6, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Cepton received a credible third-party bid valuing the company at more than double the Koito Acquisition, which was not disclosed to shareholders [5]. - It is alleged that Cepton's Board of Directors failed to adequately explore the third-party offer and did not disclose its terms when recommending the Koito Acquisition to shareholders [5]. - As a result of these actions, shareholders were deprived of the opportunity to meaningfully consider the acquisition, leading to materially false and misleading public statements by the defendants [5]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors who purchased or sold Cepton, Inc. common stock during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To join the class action, interested parties can visit the provided link or contact the law firm directly for more information [3][6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cepton, Inc. for allegedly failing to disclose a competing acquisition bid during the approval process of its merger with Koito Manufacturing Co., which may have undervalued Cepton shares [1][3][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who traded Cepton shares between July 29, 2024, and January 6, 2025 [1][2]. - The merger proposal from Koito valued Cepton shares at $3.17 each, while a credible third-party bid valued the company at more than double that amount [3][5]. - The Delaware Court of Chancery is currently handling a lawsuit from former shareholders against Cepton's senior officers, revealing that proxy materials for the Koito acquisition concealed material information [4][5]. Group 2: Allegations Against Cepton - Cepton's Board of Directors allegedly did not adequately explore the competing offer and failed to disclose its terms when recommending the Koito transaction to shareholders [5]. - The complaint also suggests that Cepton's CEO had conflicts of interest regarding the Koito proposal, further complicating the situation for shareholders [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action has been initiated against Cepton, Inc. for securities fraud during the specified class period from July 29, 2024, to January 6, 2025, with a deadline for lead plaintiff motion filings set for December 8, 2025 [1]. Group 1 - The Portnoy Law Firm is advising investors who purchased Cepton securities during the class period to take legal action [1][2]. - Investors can contact attorney Lesley F. Portnoy for a complimentary case evaluation and to discuss their legal rights [2]. - The investigation focuses on potential securities fraud or unlawful business practices by Cepton, Inc. and its officers or directors [2]. Group 2 - The Portnoy Law Firm has a history of representing investors in claims related to corporate wrongdoing, having recovered over $5.5 billion for aggrieved investors [3].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cepton, Inc. for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the specified class period [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for investors who purchased Cepton securities between July 29, 2024, and January 6, 2025 [2]. - The Complaint alleges that Cepton's management made materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's business and operations [3]. - Specific allegations include that Cepton received a credible third-party bid valuing the company at more than double the Koito Acquisition, which was not disclosed to shareholders [3]. Group 2: Implications for Shareholders - The Complaint claims that the Board of Directors failed to explore the third-party offer meaningfully and did not disclose its terms when recommending the Koito Acquisition [3]. - As a result, shareholders were deprived of the opportunity to consider whether to accept or reject the Koito Acquisition [3]. Group 3: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses in Cepton have until December 8, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the case [4]. - The law firm representing the class action operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they will only collect fees if successful [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cepton, Inc. alleging that the company misled investors regarding its acquisition by Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd. [1][2] Group 1: Allegations - The lawsuit claims that Cepton did not disclose a credible third-party bid that valued the company at more than double the acquisition price offered by Koito, which was $3.17 per share [3] - It is alleged that Cepton's Board of Directors failed to adequately explore the third-party offer and did not disclose its terms when recommending the Koito acquisition to shareholders [3] - As a result of these actions, shareholders were deprived of the opportunity to make an informed decision regarding the acquisition [3] Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Shareholders interested in participating as lead plaintiffs in the class action must file their papers with the court by December 8, 2025 [4] - Participation in the case is not required to be eligible for recovery, allowing shareholders to remain absent class members if they choose [4] Group 3: Firm Background - Robbins LLP is noted for its focus on shareholder rights litigation, helping shareholders recover losses and improve corporate governance since 2002 [5]