Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fluor Corporation securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Fluor securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by November 14, 2025 [2] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [3] - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding the costs associated with several major projects, which were impacted by subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [4] - It is claimed that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, negatively affected Fluor's business and financial results, rendering its financial guidance for 2025 unreliable [4] - The lawsuit asserts that the public statements made by Fluor were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the true details became known [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of Fluor Corporation regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and undisclosed costs related to infrastructure projects [1][3]. Summary by Sections Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [3]. - Allegations include that Fluor Corporation failed to disclose increasing costs associated with infrastructure projects due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [3]. - The lawsuit claims that these issues, along with reduced customer capital spending and economic uncertainty, negatively impacted Fluor's business and financial results [3]. Financial Guidance and Risk Mitigation - The complaint asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for FY 2025 was unreliable and that the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategy was overstated [3]. - It is alleged that the impact of economic uncertainty on the company's business was understated, leading to materially false and misleading public statements [3]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by November 14, 2025, to participate in potential recovery [4]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the case's status [4]. Law Firm Background - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm focused on protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [5]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of Fluor Corporation who incurred losses exceeding $100,000 during the specified class period to seek legal counsel before the lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Fluor securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any upfront costs through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must act by the November 14, 2025 deadline to serve as lead plaintiff [3][5]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding project costs related to the Gordie Howe International Bridge and various Texas highway projects, which were impacted by subcontractor errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [5]. - It is claimed that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, negatively affected Fluor's business and financial results, rendering their financial guidance for 2025 unreliable [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that the public statements made by Fluor were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fluor Corporation securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit on November 14, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Fluor securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by November 14, 2025 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding the financial impact of various projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and Texas highway projects, due to rising costs and economic uncertainty [5]. - It is claimed that these misstatements led to an unreliable financial outlook for Fluor for the full year 2025, ultimately resulting in investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5].

Core Insights - Fluor has been selected for the front-end engineering and design of a sustainable aviation fuel hub in England, indicating a strategic move towards renewable energy solutions in the aviation sector [1] Company Summary - Fluor's involvement in the sustainable aviation fuel hub project highlights its commitment to advancing sustainable energy technologies and positions the company as a key player in the growing market for renewable fuels [1] Industry Summary - The selection of Fluor for this project reflects the increasing demand for sustainable aviation fuel, which is becoming a critical component in the aviation industry's efforts to reduce carbon emissions and enhance environmental sustainability [1]

Core Insights - LanzaJet, Inc. has awarded the Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED) for Project Speedbird to Fluor Corporation, marking a significant step in the development of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) technology [1][2] - Project Speedbird will be a commercial scale ethanol-to-SAF facility located in Teesside, UK, producing over 90,000 tonnes (30 million gallons) of SAF and renewable diesel annually, significantly reducing CO emissions for British Airways [1][3] - The project is expected to create hundreds of jobs and has received £10 million ($13 million) in funding from the U.K. Government through its Advanced Fuels Fund [2][3] Company Overview - LanzaJet is recognized as a leading alternative fuels technology provider, specializing in patented ethanol-based alcohol-to-jet (ATJ) technology [4] - The company is supported by a diverse group of investors and funders, including major corporations and government entities, highlighting its impact on economic development and energy security [4] - LanzaJet has received accolades such as being named a TIME100 Most Influential Company and a Rising Star Company of the Year by S&P Global [4] Industry Impact - Project Speedbird is positioned as a pivotal advancement in the global effort to decarbonize aviation, aiming to redefine the future of flight through the adoption of sustainable fuel technologies [3] - The project utilizes LanzaJet's patented ATJ technology, which has already been deployed at a commercial scale in Georgia, USA, indicating the company's capability in sustainable fuel production [3]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and financial prospects during the specified class period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [3][7]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that Fluor's management failed to disclose significant cost increases related to major projects, including the Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35 projects, due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, were likely to have a significant negative impact on Fluor's business and financial results [3]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is claimed to be unreliable and unrealistic, with an overstated effectiveness of the company's risk mitigation strategy and an understated impact of economic uncertainty [3]. Next Steps - Investors who purchased Fluor shares and suffered losses are encouraged to contact the law firm Bragar Eagel & Squire for more information regarding their rights and potential claims [4][7]. - The deadline for investors to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is November 14, 2025 [7]. About the Law Firm - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm that represents individual and institutional investors in complex litigation across various courts in the United States [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation, alleging securities fraud that negatively impacted investors between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that Fluor Corporation concealed rising costs associated with infrastructure projects due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [2]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, significantly harmed the Company's business and financial results [2]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is claimed to be unreliable, with overstated risk mitigation strategies and understated impacts of economic uncertainty [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until November 14, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this role [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, indicating no financial obligation to participate [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions for shareholders over the past 20 years [4]. - The firm is recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States, ranking in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (FLR) by Berger Montague on behalf of investors who acquired shares between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, due to alleged misrepresentation of the company's financial condition and undisclosed issues with major infrastructure projects [1][3]. Company Overview - Fluor Corporation, headquartered in Irving, Texas, provides engineering, procurement, construction, and project management services globally, with its Urban Solutions segment being the largest revenue contributor [2]. Allegations and Investigation - The investigation focuses on claims that FLR misrepresented its financial health and concealed escalating issues related to significant infrastructure projects, including rising costs and delays in the Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35 projects [3]. Financial Performance - On August 1, 2025, FLR reported disappointing Q2 2025 results, with earnings per share (EPS) of $0.43 and revenue of $3.98 billion, missing consensus estimates by $0.13 and $570 million, respectively. The company reduced its full-year forecast, attributing the shortfall to project execution failures and a slowdown in new contract awards. Following this announcement, FLR's stock price fell over 27%, closing at $41.42 on the same day [4]. Market Reaction - In response to the negative news, several brokerages downgraded FLR's stock, citing significant concerns regarding the company's internal controls and transparency [5].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of Fluor Corporation regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and undisclosed costs related to infrastructure projects, which negatively impacted the company's financial outlook [1]. Group 1: Allegations and Impact - The complaint alleges that during the class period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025, Fluor Corporation failed to disclose increasing costs associated with infrastructure projects due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [1]. - It is claimed that customer reductions in capital spending and hesitations due to economic uncertainty were likely to have a significant negative impact on Fluor's business and financial results [1]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is described as unreliable and unrealistic, with an overstated effectiveness of the company's risk mitigation strategy and an understated impact of economic uncertainty [1]. Group 2: Class Action Details - Shareholders who purchased shares of Fluor during the specified class period are encouraged to register for the class action, with a deadline for lead plaintiff appointment set for November 14, 2025 [2]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [2]. Group 3: Law Firm's Mission - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of investors affected by deceit, fraud, and illegal business practices [3]. - The firm aims to ensure that companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements or omissions that inflated stock prices [3].