Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation, alleging securities fraud that negatively impacted shareholders between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025 [2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Fluor Corporation made false statements and concealed significant issues related to costs associated with infrastructure projects, including subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, had a substantial negative impact on the company's business and financial results [3]. - The complaint further asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for FY 2025 was unreliable, the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategy was overstated, and the impact of economic uncertainty was understated [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Affected Shareholders - Shareholders who suffered losses during the specified timeframe are encouraged to seek information about their rights to recovery, with no cost or obligation to participate [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Levi & Korsinsky LLP, a recognized securities litigation firm, has a strong track record in securing recoveries for shareholders and has been ranked among the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [5].

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR) is facing allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its financial performance and project costs during the class period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. Summary by Sections Allegations - The complaint claims that Fluor's costs for infrastructure projects, including Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35, were increasing due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [1]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and hesitance due to economic uncertainty, were significantly impacting Fluor's business and financial results [1]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is described as unreliable and unrealistic, with an overstated effectiveness of the company's risk mitigation strategy and an understated impact of economic uncertainty [1]. Class Action Details - Shareholders who purchased FLR shares during the specified class period are encouraged to register for potential lead plaintiff appointment, with a deadline set for November 14, 2025 [2]. - Registered shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software throughout the lifecycle of the case [2]. Law Firm Background - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [3]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements or omissions [3].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit for purchasers of Fluor Corporation securities during the specified Class Period, highlighting the importance of the lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Fluor securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must act by the lead plaintiff deadline to represent other class members [3][6]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [3][6]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, noting its history of successful settlements and recognition in the field [4]. - The firm has achieved significant recoveries for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance, which were impacted by subcontractor errors, price increases, and economic uncertainty [5]. - It is claimed that these misstatements led to a significant negative impact on Fluor's business and financial results, resulting in damages for investors when the truth was revealed [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors of Fluor Corporation to secure counsel before the lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made by the company during a specified class period [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025, and the lead plaintiff deadline is November 14, 2025 [1][3]. - Investors who purchased Fluor securities during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Allegations Against Fluor Corporation - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor made false and misleading statements regarding the costs associated with several major projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and various Texas highways, due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [5]. - It is claimed that these issues, along with reduced customer capital spending and economic uncertainty, negatively impacted Fluor's business and financial results, rendering the company's financial guidance for 2025 unreliable [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that the public statements made by Fluor were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its success in securities class action settlements, ranking No. 1 in 2017 and consistently in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors of Fluor Corporation to secure counsel before the lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made by the company during the class period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Fluor securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by November 14, 2025 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor made false and misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance, which negatively impacted the company's business and financial results [5]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may lack the necessary experience and resources [4]. - The Rosen Law Firm has a history of successful settlements in securities class actions, including significant recoveries for investors [4]. Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit claims that costs associated with specific projects were increasing due to subcontractor errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays, which were not disclosed to investors [5]. - It is asserted that the company's financial guidance for 2025 was unreliable, and the impact of economic uncertainty on Fluor's performance was understated [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fluor Corporation securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Fluor securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by the November 14, 2025 deadline [2] - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3] Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding project costs related to the Gordie Howe International Bridge and various Texas highway projects, which were impacted by subcontractor errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [4] - It is claimed that these issues, along with reduced customer capital spending and economic uncertainty, negatively affected Fluor's business and financial results, rendering their financial guidance for 2025 unreliable [4] - The lawsuit asserts that the public statements made by Fluor were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of Fluor Corporation to secure legal counsel before the lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made by the company during a specified class period [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025, and the lead plaintiff deadline is November 14, 2025 [1]. - Investors who purchased Fluor securities during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting the Rosen Law Firm [3][6]. Group 2: Allegations Against Fluor Corporation - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor made false and misleading statements regarding project costs associated with the Gordie Howe International Bridge and various Texas highway projects, which were impacted by subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [5]. - It is claimed that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, negatively affected Fluor's business and financial results [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for 2025 was unreliable, and the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategy was overstated [5].

Market Overview - U.S. stocks experienced a decline, with the Dow Jones index dropping over 200 points, down 0.47% to 46,693.85, NASDAQ falling 1.42% to 22,725.49, and S&P 500 decreasing 0.82% to 6,664.90 [1] - European shares also fell, with the eurozone's STOXX 600 down 0.55%, Spain's IBEX 35 Index down 1.3%, and other major indices in London, Germany, and France also declining [5] - Asian markets closed lower, with Japan's Nikkei 225 down 1.19%, Hong Kong's Hang Seng down 0.92%, and China's Shanghai Composite down 0.25% [6] Company Performance - Fluor Corporation's shares fell 2% after reporting third-quarter results, with adjusted earnings per share at 68 cents, exceeding the 45-cent estimate, but revenue fell 18% to $3.37 billion, below the $4.20 billion consensus [2] - Motorsport Games Inc saw a significant increase in shares, rising 84% to $4.02 due to a year-over-year increase in third-quarter sales [8] - BIO-Key International Inc shares surged 66% to $1.06 following the announcement of significant biometric and IAM deployment in the Middle East [8] - Gulf Island Fabrication Inc shares increased by 50% to $11.76 after IES agreed to acquire the company for $12 per share in cash [8] - Eledon Pharmaceuticals Inc shares dropped 54% to $1.88 after announcing results from its Phase 2 BESTOW trial [8] - Energys Group Ltd shares fell 46% to $2.14, and Functional Brands shares decreased by 47% to $0.68 [8] Economic Indicators - The University of Michigan's consumer sentiment index declined to 50.3 in November from 53.6 in the previous month, below market expectations of 53.2 [10] - Median inflation expectations in the U.S. eased to 3.2% for the one-year horizon in October, down from 3.4% in September [10]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of enabling Javascript and cookies in browsers to prevent access issues [1] - It highlights that users with ad-blockers may face restrictions when trying to access content [1]

Market Overview - Pre-market trading has declined, reflecting a cautious sentiment towards AI infrastructure spending and a lack of economic data, particularly during what was expected to be Jobs Week [1] - The market has seen a downward trend over the past five days, moving away from all-time highs reached in late October [1] Employment Data - Non-farm payroll numbers from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) are unavailable due to a government shutdown, with estimates suggesting a loss of 60,000 jobs last month [2] - The unemployment rate is expected to rise to 4.5%, while hourly wages are anticipated to remain steady at a year-over-year increase of 0.3% [2] - ADP reported an addition of 42,000 new jobs, which is better than BLS estimates but still indicates a weak labor market [3] - The Challenger Job Cuts report indicated 153,000 job cuts, highlighting ongoing challenges in employment [3] Interest Rate Expectations - There is a tentative expectation for a 25 basis-point interest rate cut in approximately 4.5 weeks, although market indexes may have already priced in this cut [4] - The "neutral rate" of inflation is uncertain but is believed to be higher than the optimal 2% [4] Earnings Reports - Wendy's (WEN) reported Q3 earnings of $0.24 per share, exceeding expectations by 20%, leading to a 9% increase in shares [5] - Six Flags Entertainment (FUN) posted earnings of $3.28 per share, surpassing the consensus estimate by 46.4%, although shares are down 2% in early trading [5] - Fluor (FLR) reported Q3 earnings of $0.68 per share, beating expectations by 54.55%, with shares up 4.6% in pre-market trading [6] - Constellation Energy (CEG) reported earnings of $3.04 per share, falling short of the anticipated $3.13, resulting in a 6.3% decline in shares [7] - Canopy Growth (CGC) shares increased by 12% despite reporting a loss of $0.01 per share, an improvement from the expected loss of $0.10 [8] Consumer Sentiment and Credit - The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment report for November is expected to show a slight decrease to 53.0 from 53.6, remaining above the neutral threshold of 50 [9] - Consumer credit for September is projected to total $10.0 billion [9]