Core Viewpoint - A class-action lawsuit has been filed against KBR, Inc. alleging misleading statements to investors prior to the cancellation of a significant military contract, which adversely affected the company's business outlook [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to represent investors who acquired KBR securities between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025 [1][2]. - The legal action claims that KBR executives provided an overly optimistic outlook on a crucial partnership just before its collapse [2][5]. - The lawsuit highlights that KBR was aware of operational issues with the HomeSafe partnership but failed to disclose this information to investors [5][6]. Group 2: Contract Cancellation Impact - The Department of Defense's U.S. Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) canceled its global household goods contract with HomeSafe Alliance LLC, a joint venture led by KBR, resulting in a share price drop of over 7% [3][5]. - The contract was valued at up to $20 billion over a potential nine-year term, indicating a significant financial loss for KBR [3]. - Following the contract termination, KBR revised its low-end 2025 revenue guidance downward by approximately $900 million (-9%) due to the removal of the HomeSafe JV revenue contribution [6]. Group 3: Company Statements - During the Q1 earnings call on May 6, 2025, KBR assured investors that the HomeSafe partnership was "strong" and "excellent," projecting a mid-point revenue contribution of about $400 million for 2025 [4][6]. - After the contract termination, KBR management acknowledged operational challenges during the Q2 earnings call on July 31, 2025 [6].

Core Points - Rosen Law Firm is reminding KBR, Inc. investors of the November 18, 2025 deadline to join a securities class action lawsuit related to the company's performance during the Class Period from May 6, 2025, to June 19, 2025 [1][2] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased KBR securities during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and potential lead plaintiffs must move the Court by November 18, 2025 [3] - The lawsuit alleges that KBR made materially false and misleading statements regarding its partnership with HomeSafe and the ability to fulfill the Global Household Goods Contract, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [5] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in recovering hundreds of millions for investors [4] - The firm has been recognized for its performance in securities class action settlements, including being ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services in 2017 and securing over $438 million for investors in 2019 [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class-action lawsuit has been filed against KBR, Inc. alleging misleading statements to investors prior to the cancellation of a significant military contract, which adversely affected the company's business outlook [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit aims to represent investors who acquired KBR securities between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025 [1][2]. - The legal action claims that KBR executives provided an overly optimistic outlook on a crucial partnership just before its collapse [2]. Group 2: Contract Cancellation Impact - The lawsuit is linked to the Department of Defense's cancellation of a global household goods contract with HomeSafe Alliance LLC, a joint venture led by KBR, which was valued at up to $20 billion over nine years [3]. - Following the contract termination announcement on June 20, 2025, KBR shares dropped over 7% as investors reacted to the loss [3]. Group 3: Misrepresentation Allegations - On May 6, 2025, during its Q1 earnings call, KBR assured investors that the HomeSafe partnership was "strong" and projected a revenue contribution of approximately $400 million for 2025 [4]. - Just weeks later, on June 19, 2025, HomeSafe revealed that TRANSCOM had terminated the contract due to operational issues, which KBR allegedly knew about but did not disclose to investors [5]. Group 4: Financial Repercussions - After the class period, KBR revised its low-end 2025 revenue guidance downward by about $900 million (-9%) due to the removal of the HomeSafe JV revenue contribution [6]. - KBR management acknowledged operational challenges during the Q2 2025 earnings call, raising questions about whether the company misled investors regarding the contract's status [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against KBR, Inc. alleging securities fraud that affected shareholders between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025 [2][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that KBR, Inc. made false statements regarding its partnership with HomeSafe, despite knowing that the U.S. Department of Defense had concerns about HomeSafe's ability to fulfill a global household goods contract [3]. - The defendants allegedly misled investors about KBR's business operations and future prospects, which were claimed to be materially false and misleading [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Affected Shareholders - Shareholders who suffered losses during the specified timeframe are encouraged to seek information about their rights to recovery, with no cost or obligation to participate [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Levi & Korsinsky LLP, a recognized securities litigation firm, has a strong track record in securing recoveries for shareholders and has been ranked among the top securities litigation firms in the U.S. for seven consecutive years [5].

Core Points - A class action lawsuit has been filed against KBR, Inc. on behalf of investors who acquired shares between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025 [1][2] - The lawsuit alleges that KBR misled investors regarding a contract with the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command, despite internal concerns about the contract [3] - Following the announcement of the contract termination on June 19, 2025, KBR's stock price dropped by $3.85, or 7%, closing at $48.93 on June 20, 2025 [4] Company Overview - KBR, headquartered in Houston, is a global provider of science, technology, and engineering solutions for governmental and commercial clients [2] Legal Context - Investors who purchased KBR securities during the class period have until November 18, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of KBR, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading statements related to the company's partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command [1]. Group 1: Allegations and Class Period - The class period for the allegations is from May 6, 2025, to June 19, 2025 [1]. - Allegations include that KBR's management misrepresented the status of its partnership with HomeSafe, despite knowing about significant concerns regarding HomeSafe's ability to fulfill a global household goods contract [1]. - The complaint claims that KBR's statements about its business operations and prospects were materially false and misleading during the class period [1]. Group 2: Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by November 18, 2025, to potentially become lead plaintiffs [2]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the case's progress [2]. - Participation in the case incurs no cost or obligation for the shareholders [2]. Group 3: Law Firm's Mission - The Gross Law Firm aims to protect investors' rights who have suffered due to deceit and illegal business practices [3]. - The firm is dedicated to ensuring companies engage in responsible business practices and good corporate citizenship [3]. - The firm seeks recovery for investors who experienced losses due to misleading statements or omissions that inflated stock prices [3].

Core Insights - The article highlights the author's extensive experience in financial analysis across various sectors, emphasizing expertise in market analysis, valuation models, and investment strategy [1]. Group 1: Experience and Background - The author has over 13 years of diverse financial analysis experience, particularly in the Auto, Industrials, and IT sectors [1]. - Previous roles include working in treasury for Ford and Caterpillar, as well as managing investor relations and strategic finance for a listed IT company with a market cap of approximately USD 2.5 billion [1]. - The author's background also includes experience as an equity research analyst, which has contributed to a strong understanding of business growth drivers [1].

Core Insights - The article highlights the author's extensive experience in financial analysis across various sectors, emphasizing expertise in market analysis, valuation models, and investment strategy [1]. Group 1: Experience and Background - The author has over 13 years of diverse financial analysis experience, particularly in the Auto, Industrials, and IT sectors [1]. - Previous roles include working in treasury for Ford and Caterpillar, as well as managing investor relations and strategic finance for a listed IT company with a market cap of approximately USD 2.5 billion [1]. - The author's background also includes experience as an equity research analyst, which has contributed to a strong understanding of business growth drivers [1].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased KBR, Inc. securities between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a securities class action lawsuit on November 18, 2025 [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought KBR securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by November 18, 2025 [3] - The lawsuit alleges that KBR made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and the Global Household Goods Contract with the U.S. Department of Defense [5] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4] - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements since 2013 [4]

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against KBR, Inc. related to alleged violations of federal securities laws, urging affected investors to contact them before the November 18, 2025 deadline for lead plaintiff applications in a federal securities class action [2][5]. Group 1: Allegations Against KBR - The complaint alleges that KBR and its executives made false and misleading statements regarding the Global Household Goods Contract with the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command (TRANSCOM), despite being aware of material concerns about HomeSafe's ability to fulfill the contract [5]. - The lawsuit claims that KBR's statements about its business operations and prospects were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [5]. Group 2: Stock Price Impact - Following the announcement of TRANSCOM's notice to terminate the Global Household Goods Contract, KBR's stock price fell by $3.85 per share, or 7.29%, closing at $48.93 on June 20, 2025 [6]. - On the next trading day, KBR's stock experienced an additional decline of $1.30, or 2.65%, closing at $47.63 on June 23, 2025 [6]. Group 3: Legal Process and Participation - The lead plaintiff in the class action will be the investor with the largest financial interest who is also adequate and typical of class members, overseeing the litigation on behalf of the class [7]. - Any member of the putative class can move the court to serve as lead plaintiff or choose to remain an absent class member, with their ability to share in any recovery unaffected by this decision [7].