Workflow
CS Disco(LAW)
icon
Search documents
ROSEN, A LEADING INVESTOR RIGHTS LAW FIRM, Encourages DexCom, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - DXCM
Newsfile· 2025-11-05 23:17
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of DexCom, Inc. to secure legal counsel before the December 29, 2025 deadline for a securities class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made by the company during the class period from July 26, 2024, to September 17, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased DexCom securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and potential lead plaintiffs must act by December 29, 2025 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that DexCom made false statements regarding the reliability and safety of its G6 and G7 continuous glucose monitoring systems, which were not authorized by the FDA [5]. Group 2: Allegations Against DexCom - The lawsuit claims that DexCom's design changes to the G6 and G7 systems rendered them less reliable, posing health risks to users [5]. - It is alleged that the company overstated the enhancements and reliability of the G7 device while downplaying the severity of the issues related to the devices [5]. - The allegations suggest that DexCom faced increased regulatory scrutiny and potential legal, reputational, and financial harm due to these misleading statements [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its effectiveness in representing clients [4].
CS Disco(LAW) - 2025 Q3 - Earnings Call Transcript
2025-11-05 23:00
Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Software revenue in Q3 was $35.2 million, up 17% year-over-year, while total revenue was $40.9 million, up 13% year-over-year [5][26] - Adjusted EBITDA for Q3 was negative $297,000, representing an adjusted EBITDA margin of negative 1%, which is a $4.2 million improvement over Q3 of 2024 [5][29] - The company ended Q3 with $113.5 million in cash and short-term investments and no debt [5][29] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Revenue growth was driven by both large and small matters, particularly in multi-terabyte matters [26][27] - Services revenues, including Disco Managed Review and Professional Services, were $5.7 million [27] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The number of customers contributing over $100,000 in total revenue over the last 12 months reached 326, accounting for 76% of total revenue [6] - The adoption of Cecilia AI more than tripled year-over-year, with consistent growth in auto-review adoption throughout 2025 [7][20] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focusing on large multi-terabyte matters and has refined its approach to target customers that best fit its capabilities [9][10] - Disco has initiated a marketing and sales effort specifically targeting intellectual property litigation, highlighting its strengths in this area [10][11] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about the growth acceleration and operational execution, emphasizing the importance of delivering value to customers [5][6] - The company is positioned to be a disruptor in the legal technology industry, leveraging its core platform and AI capabilities [12][25] Other Important Information - The company recognized $1.3 million in revenue from a contingent case, which was a significant contributor to the quarter's results [26][36] - The gross margin in Q3 was 77%, compared to 74% in the prior year [27] Q&A Session Summary Question: About the contingent liability or the contingent case - Management indicated that there are a small number of other contingent cases in the system, but nothing close to the size of the one recognized in Q3 [35][36] Question: Regarding the target for in-quarter EBITDA break-even for Q4 of 2026 - Management confirmed that the target for adjusted EBITDA break-even remains Q4 of 2026, while acknowledging the potential for earlier profitability [38]
CS Disco(LAW) - 2025 Q3 - Quarterly Report
2025-11-05 22:08
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) ☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2025 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-40624 CS Disco, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation o ...
CS Disco(LAW) - 2025 Q3 - Earnings Call Presentation
2025-11-05 22:00
INVESTOR PRESENTATION Q3 FY25 Disclaimer Forward-Looking Statements The forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are also subject to additional risks, uncertainties, and factors, including those more fully described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), including our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. Further information on potential risks that could affect actual results will be included in the subsequent periodic and curre ...
ROSEN, A RANKED AND LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages CarMax, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action First Filed by the Firm - KMX
Newsfile· 2025-11-05 21:42
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of CarMax, Inc. investors for securities purchased between June 20, 2025, and September 24, 2025, due to alleged misleading statements regarding the company's growth prospects [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that CarMax's defendants overstated the company's growth prospects, attributing earlier growth in the 2026 fiscal year to temporary factors related to customer behavior influenced by tariff speculation [5]. - Investors are encouraged to join the class action, with the deadline to serve as lead plaintiff set for January 2, 2026 [1][3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own success in recovering significant amounts for investors [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements, achieving notable recoveries, including over $438 million in 2019 [4].
CS Disco(LAW) - 2025 Q3 - Quarterly Results
2025-11-05 21:07
DISCO Announces Third Quarter 2025 Financial Results Total Revenue of $40.9 Million, A Year over Year Increase of 13% AUSTIN, Texas - November 5, 2025 - CS Disco, Inc. ("DISCO") (NYSE: LAW) today announced financial results for its third quarter ended September 30, 2025. "Our strategy to bring large clients and large matters to DISCO continued to gain traction in the third quarter with meaningful acceleration in both software and total revenue," said Eric Friedrichsen, CEO of DISCO. "The growing number of l ...
CS Disco Inc (LAW)'s Upcoming Quarterly Earnings: A Financial Overview
Financial Modeling Prep· 2025-11-05 02:00
Core Insights - CS Disco Inc (LAW) is expected to report a quarterly earnings per share (EPS) of -$0.06 and revenue of approximately $38.5 million on November 5, 2025 [1][5] - The company has a negative price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of -6.47, indicating ongoing challenges with profitability [1] Financial Metrics - Despite negative earnings, LAW's price-to-sales ratio stands at 2.49, suggesting that investors are willing to pay $2.49 for every dollar of sales, reflecting some investor confidence [2][5] - The enterprise value to sales ratio is slightly lower at 2.40, closely aligning with the price-to-sales ratio [2] - The company maintains a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.06, indicating a conservative approach to debt usage [3][5] - LAW's current ratio is strong at 6.75, suggesting it is well-positioned to cover short-term liabilities with short-term assets [3][5] Cash Flow and Profitability - The enterprise value to operating cash flow ratio is -22.95, indicating negative operating cash flow, which may raise concerns for investors [4] - The earnings yield is reported at -15.46%, further highlighting the company's profitability challenges [4]
ROSEN, A GLOBAL AND LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages MoonLake Immunotherapeutics Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – MLTX
Globenewswire· 2025-11-01 19:09
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased common stock of MoonLake Immunotherapeutics during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on December 15, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought MoonLake common stock between March 10, 2024, and September 29, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6]. - The lawsuit claims that defendants made false or misleading statements regarding the efficacy of their product compared to traditional monoclonal antibodies, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [5]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may not have the necessary experience or resources [4]. - The Rosen Law Firm has a history of successful settlements in securities class actions, including a notable settlement against a Chinese company and significant recoveries for investors in previous years [4].
ROSEN, A RANKED AND LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Marex Group plc Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – MRX
Globenewswire· 2025-11-01 13:24
Core Points - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Marex Group plc securities from May 16, 2024, to August 5, 2025, about the December 8, 2025, lead plaintiff deadline [1] - Investors who purchased Marex securities during the specified period may be entitled to compensation through a contingency fee arrangement [1] Class Action Details - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Marex Group plc, with allegations of materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's financial practices [4] - Specific claims include Marex selling over-the-counter financial instruments to itself, inconsistencies in financial statements, and misleading positive statements about the company's business and prospects [4] Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may not have the necessary experience [3] - Rosen Law Firm has a history of successful settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time, and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [3]
ROSEN, A GLOBAL INVESTOR RIGHTS LAW FIRM, Encourages Sina Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - SINA
Globenewswire· 2025-10-31 22:53
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding sellers of ordinary shares of Sina Corporation about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action related to the Merger that occurred between October 13, 2020, and March 22, 2021 [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Sellers of Sina ordinary shares during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by November 18, 2025 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that defendants created a fraudulent scheme to depress the value of Sina ordinary shares to avoid paying a fair price to shareholders during the Merger [5]. Group 2: Allegations Against Defendants - The defendants are accused of misrepresenting and omitting material information in Sina's proxy materials, which were necessary for shareholders to make informed decisions regarding the Merger [5]. - Specific allegations include the concealment of the true value of Sina's investment in TuSimple and that the offered price of $43.30 per ordinary share significantly undervalued Sina's shares [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has been ranked highly for its number of securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].