Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Klarna Group plc about a class action lawsuit related to Klarna's September 2025 IPO, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for February 20, 2026 [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Klarna securities may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement contained false or misleading statements regarding Klarna's loss reserves, which were understated, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [5]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019, and has been recognized as a leader in the field of securities class action litigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. due to allegations of materially misleading business information issued by the company [1]. Financial Performance - On January 29, 2026, PennyMac reported its fourth quarter and full-year 2025 financial results, revealing a pretax income of $37.3 million for its servicing segment, a significant decrease from $157.4 million in the prior quarter and $87.3 million in the same quarter of 2024 [3]. - The report indicated that pretax income excluding valuation-related items was $47.8 million, down 70% from the previous quarter, primarily due to increased realization of mortgage servicing rights cash flows as lower mortgage rates led to higher prepayment activity [3]. Stock Market Reaction - Following the financial report, PennyMac's stock price dropped by $49.78 per share, or 33.3%, closing at $99.92 per share on January 30, 2026 [3]. Legal Action - Investors who purchased PennyMac securities may be entitled to compensation through a class action lawsuit being prepared by Rosen Law Firm, which operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning no out-of-pocket costs for investors [2]. - Interested investors can join the class action by submitting a form or contacting the law firm directly [2]. Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements and being recognized for its success in the field [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Oracle Corporation regarding the issuance of senior notes, alleging that the Offering Documents contained misleading statements about the company's financial needs for AI infrastructure development [1][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Oracle failed to disclose the need for significant additional debt to build its AI infrastructure, which raised concerns about the creditworthiness of the bonds [4]. - Investors are encouraged to join the class action without incurring out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in recovering substantial amounts for investors [3]. - The firm has been recognized for its performance in securities class action settlements, including a notable settlement against a Chinese company and ranking highly in the number of settlements achieved [3]. Group 3: Next Steps for Investors - Interested investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the firm directly for more information [2][5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Plug Power Inc. securities during the specified Class Period, indicating potential legal issues surrounding the company's disclosures and statements [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit pertains to securities purchased between January 17, 2025, and November 13, 2025, and a lead plaintiff must be appointed by April 3, 2026 [1][3]. - Investors who purchased Plug Power securities during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Allegations Against Plug Power - The lawsuit claims that defendants made false and misleading statements regarding the likelihood of funds from the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan being available to Plug Power and the construction of necessary hydrogen production facilities [5]. - It is alleged that Plug Power was likely to shift towards less ambitious projects with lower commercial potential, which rendered the company's public statements materially false and misleading [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its success in securities class action settlements, ranking No. 1 in 2017 and consistently in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Klarna Group plc about a class action lawsuit related to the company's September 2025 IPO, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for February 20, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Klarna securities may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement contained false or misleading statements regarding Klarna's loss reserves, which were understated, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019, and has been recognized as a leader in the field of securities class action litigation [4].

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 5, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Beyond Meat, Inc. (NASDAQ: BYND) between February 27, 2025 and November 11, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important March 24, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.SO WHAT: If you purchased Beyond Meat securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingenc ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased common stock of Varonis Systems, Inc. during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Varonis common stock between February 4, 2025, and October 28, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 9, 2026 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Case Background - The lawsuit alleges that Varonis made materially false and misleading statements regarding its ability to maintain Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) projections while transitioning customers to a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model [5]. - It is claimed that Varonis was not adequately prepared to convince existing users of the benefits of the SaaS offering, leading to reduced ARR growth potential [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that the misleading statements about Varonis' business and prospects resulted in investor damages when the true situation became known [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its effectiveness in representing investor rights [4].

Donovan Jones is an IPO research specialist with 15 years of experience analyzing investment opportunities for U.S. IPOs.He also leads the investing group IPO Edge, which offers actionable information on growth stocks through first-look IPO filings, previews on upcoming IPOs, an IPO calendar for tracking what’s on the horizon, a database of U.S. IPOs, and a guide to IPO investing to walk you through the entire IPO lifecycle - from filing to listing to quiet period and lockup expiration dates. Learn moreAnal ...

Core Viewpoint - The emergence of native AI models, exemplified by Anthropic's new automation tools, poses a significant threat to traditional software companies, raising questions about the sustainability of their business models and competitive advantages [2][3]. Group 1: Impact of Anthropic's Tools - Anthropic's release of a legal tool plugin for its Claude Cowork platform has triggered panic selling in the software sector, particularly affecting legal software and data service companies [2]. - Major companies like Thomson Reuters and LegalZoom saw their stock prices plummet by 21% and over 20% respectively, as their core business models were directly challenged by the cost-effective and integrated solutions offered by AI [3]. - The market fears that if companies can use a single AI plugin to handle legal compliance tasks that previously required multiple expensive software subscriptions, the subscription value of traditional SaaS companies will be severely undermined [3]. Group 2: Subscription Model Crisis - The term "SaaSpocalypse" reflects the growing concern that AI advancements may not just assist growth but could potentially replace traditional subscription models entirely [5]. - The traditional software industry's reliance on high-margin recurring revenue from seat-based billing is threatened as AI agents can perform tasks that previously required multiple personnel [5]. - This shift in expectations regarding future growth is a key driver behind the current wave of panic selling in the software sector [5]. Group 3: Performance Discrepancies - Among S&P 500 software stocks, only 69% reported revenues above expectations, significantly lower than the tech sector's overall 85% success rate, indicating a weak position in the AI-driven market [6]. - Even strong performers like Microsoft are under scrutiny as their Azure cloud business shows signs of slowing growth, leading to a decline in stock price over four consecutive trading days [6]. - In contrast, Palantir emerged as a rare "safe haven" with a 70% revenue increase in Q4, suggesting that the market is selectively favoring companies that can effectively leverage AI to enhance productivity [6]. Group 4: Market Reallocation - Despite the Nasdaq's poor performance, the S&P 500 shows a "seesaw" effect, with companies like FedEx and Walmart gaining market value, indicating a shift of funds from vulnerable software stocks to more defensively positioned sectors [7]. - The selling pressure on software stocks is characterized by a "surrender" mentality among investors, who are eager to exit positions regardless of price [7]. - From an investment perspective, extreme panic often creates opportunities, as evidenced by Microsoft's valuation dropping to a three-year low with a forward P/E ratio around 25 [7]. Group 5: Future Outlook - The year 2026 is anticipated to be a pivotal moment for the software industry, as AI programming and automation lower development barriers and diminish traditional business moats [8]. - The consensus on Wall Street has shifted fundamentally, with software no longer seen as a guaranteed profit generator in the face of competition from companies like Anthropic that possess foundational AI models [8]. - Investors are advised to focus on identifying companies with core competencies that are not easily replaceable by automation, rather than blindly attempting to catch falling stocks [8].

NEW YORK, Feb. 04, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE: BRBR) between November 19, 2024 and August 4, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important March 23, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased BellRing securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement ...