（截至发稿，OWL股价较低点反弹21.3%） 另类资产管理巨头Blue Owl正加速其在数字基础设施领域的扩张，该公司为其最新的数据中心专项基金募资17亿美元。 根据监管文件显示，12月1日，这只非交易型房地产投资信托基金（REIT）Blue Owl Digital Infrastructure Trust完成首次募资并开始运营。 作为启动运营的一部分，该基金还以约15亿美元（扣除承担的债务后）的净值，从业内关联公司手中收购了11个数据中心的权益。文件显示，这 些数据中心主要租赁给投资级和超大规模客户。 此次募资是Blue Owl向数据中心领域大举扩张的一部分，今年秋季该公司已为Meta和甲骨文的数据中心提供了超过500亿美元的融资。 此前Blue Owl因暂停旗下另一只基金的投资者赎回而导致其股价承压，引发了市场对其部分业务流动性的担忧。周四美股尾盘，Blue Owl涨 2.52%，较"限制赎回"风波后的低点累涨超20%。 根据另一份文件，从10月1日至12月1日，Blue Owl在其所有长青非交易型基金中总计募集了43亿美元，其中约26亿美元投向其实物资产平台，17 亿美元投向其信贷平台，显示出投资者对该 ...

Group 1 - A class action has been filed against Blue Owl Capital Inc. on behalf of investors who acquired its securities between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025 [1] - The allegations include that Blue Owl misled investors about its business prospects, specifically regarding pressure on its asset base from BDC redemptions and undisclosed liquidity issues [2] - The complaint states that due to these undisclosed issues, the company was likely to limit or halt redemptions of certain BDCs, which rendered positive statements about its business materially misleading [2] Group 2 - When the truth about the company's situation was revealed, Blue Owl's stock price fell, negatively impacting investors [2] - Shareholders interested in participating in the class action can contact Robbins LLP to serve as lead plaintiff, but participation is not required for recovery [3] - Robbins LLP operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning shareholders incur no fees or expenses [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit against Blue Owl Capital Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding its business operations and financial health during the specified class period [1][2]. Allegations - The lawsuit claims that Blue Owl Capital Inc. made false and misleading statements, failing to disclose significant pressures on its asset base due to redemptions from business development companies (BDCs) [3]. - It is alleged that Blue Owl faced undisclosed liquidity issues and was likely to limit or halt redemptions of certain BDCs, which were downplayed in their public statements [3]. - The lawsuit asserts that the positive statements made by Blue Owl regarding its business and prospects were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis [3]. Next Steps - Shareholders wishing to serve as lead plaintiffs must file motions with the court by February 2, 2026, and can remain absent class members if they choose not to participate [4]. - Participation in the class action is on a contingency fee basis, meaning shareholders incur no fees or expenses unless the case is successful [5]. About Rosen Law Firm - Rosen Law Firm is recognized for its commitment to shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $1 billion for shareholders since its inception [6].

NEW YORK, Dec. 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized law firm, notifies investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Blue Owl Capital Inc. (“Blue Owl” or “the Company”) (NYSE: OWL) and certain of its officers. Class Definition This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Blue Owl ...

Core Viewpoint - A shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against Blue Owl Capital Inc. alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business and operations, particularly concerning liquidity issues and BDC redemptions [1] Group 1: Allegations in the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that Blue Owl was experiencing significant pressure on its asset base due to BDC redemptions [1] - It is alleged that the company was facing undisclosed liquidity issues as a result of these redemptions [1] - The lawsuit suggests that Blue Owl may limit or halt redemptions of certain BDCs due to these liquidity concerns [1] - The positive statements made by the defendants about the company's business and prospects are claimed to be materially misleading and lacking a reasonable basis [1] Group 2: Legal Information - Shareholders who purchased Blue Owl shares between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025, and suffered significant losses are encouraged to discuss their legal rights [2] - The deadline to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the case is February 2, 2026 [3] - Holzer & Holzer, LLC is the law firm representing the shareholders in this litigation [3]

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Blue Owl Capital Inc. due to allegations of violations of federal securities laws, with a deadline for investors to seek lead plaintiff status by February 2, 2026 [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations Against Blue Owl Capital - The complaint alleges that Blue Owl and its executives made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant issues, including pressure on its asset base from BDC redemptions [3]. - It is claimed that Blue Owl is facing undisclosed liquidity issues and may limit or halt redemptions of certain BDCs, which misled investors regarding the company's business and prospects [3]. Group 2: Impact of Recent Developments - A Financial Times article reported that Blue Owl has blocked redemptions in one of its private credit funds due to a merger with a larger vehicle, potentially leading to large losses for investors [4]. - Following the news of the merger, Blue Owl's stock price fell by $0.85, or 5.8%, closing at $13.77 per share, indicating a negative market reaction and injury to investors [5]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings and Investor Actions - The lead plaintiff in the class action will be the investor with the largest financial interest, who will oversee the litigation on behalf of the class [6]. - Faruqi & Faruqi encourages individuals with information regarding Blue Owl's conduct to come forward, including whistleblowers and former employees [7].

Inc/&esheet=54368949&newsitemid=20251203196184&lan=en- US&anchor=HERE&index=3&md5=675d5818719021c0c361f7e8d5fb061a)**TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.****What Happened?**On October 30, 2025, before the market opened, Blue Owl reported financial results for the third quarter of 2025. Blue Owl reported, among other things, fee-related earnings of only $376.2 million, which missed consensus estimates; fee related earnings margins of 57.1%, whic ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the investment positions held by analysts in various companies, indicating a bullish sentiment towards OBDC, ARCC, BXSL, and FSK [1][2] Group 1 - Analysts have disclosed beneficial long positions in OBDC, ARCC, BXSL, and FSK, suggesting confidence in these stocks [1] - The article emphasizes that the opinions expressed are personal and not influenced by any compensation from the companies mentioned [1] - There is a clear distinction made regarding the lack of business relationships between the analysts and the companies discussed, reinforcing the independence of the analysis [2]

Coremont Investment Announcement - Coremont has received a $40 million strategic growth investment from funds managed by Blue Owl Capital [1] - This investment highlights Coremont's role as a critical infrastructure partner for asset managers, hedge funds, and financial institutions [1] - Blue Owl Capital manages $295 billion in assets, indicating significant confidence in Coremont's capabilities [1]

Core Insights - The growth of private credit and nonbank finance is raising concerns among global regulators regarding financial stability and the need for increased transparency and reporting requirements [1][8][9] Group 1: Private Credit Growth - Private credit has doubled in size over the past five years, now rivaling traditional bank lending [2] - Many midsize businesses are increasingly relying on private credit funds for financing, viewing credit as growth capital rather than a last resort [4][5] Group 2: Regulatory Concerns - The Financial Stability Board (FSB) is focusing on the rapid rise of nonbank financial intermediaries, including private credit markets, and is calling for modernized regulatory frameworks [7][8] - The FSB is likely to push for standardized data collection, reporting, and potential limits on leverage or interconnected exposures in the private credit sector [8][11] Group 3: Risks and Interconnections - The expansion of private credit has created complexities and interconnections between traditional banks, private credit funds, and borrowers, raising systemic risk concerns [6][13] - Banks are increasingly providing liquidity to private credit funds, which could pose risks to financial stability in the event of defaults [10][14] Group 4: Market Reactions and Future Implications - The market's reaction to events such as the termination of a merger involving Blue Owl Capital highlights the fragility of valuations and liquidity in private credit [12] - Firms in the payments and banking sectors that rely on private credit may face a shifting regulatory environment, requiring greater transparency and higher capital buffers [11]