Core Viewpoint - Robbins LLP has initiated a class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who acquired Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCAT) securities during the specified period, alleging that the company misled investors regarding its production capacity and the value of its contracts [1][2]. Allegations - The complaint asserts that Red Cat Holdings failed to disclose that the production capacity of its Salt Lake City Facility was overstated and that the value of the U.S. Army's Short Range Reconnaissance Program (SRR) Contract was also exaggerated [2]. - Kerrisdale Capital's report indicated that the SRR Contract was valued between $20 million and $25 million, contrary to Red Cat's claims, and raised concerns about misleading information regarding the Salt Lake City Facility's production capacity [3]. Stock Impact - Following the release of Kerrisdale Capital's report on January 16, 2025, Red Cat's stock price dropped by $2.35 per share, representing a decline of 21.54%, closing at $8.56 per share on January 17, 2025 [3]. Class Action Participation - Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiffs in the class action have until July 22, 2025, to apply for this status, although participation is not required to be eligible for recovery [4]. Company Background - Robbins LLP has been recognized for its efforts in shareholder rights litigation, focusing on helping shareholders recover losses and improve corporate governance since 2002 [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. for allegedly making false statements regarding its production capacity and contract values, impacting investor confidence and stock prices [1][3][6]. Company Overview - Red Cat Holdings, Inc. operates in the drone industry, providing products such as the "Teal 2" drone designed for military operations [2]. Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that Red Cat overstated the production capacity of its Salt Lake City facility and the value of its Short Range Reconnaissance Program contract [3]. - On July 27, 2023, Red Cat disclosed that its Salt Lake City facility could only produce 100 drones per month, with potential future capacity of 1,000 drones per month contingent on further investments [4]. - Following this announcement, Red Cat's stock price fell nearly 9% [4]. Financial Performance - On September 23, 2024, Red Cat reported a loss per share of $0.17 for Q1 fiscal year 2025, missing estimates by $0.09, and revenue of $2.8 million, missing estimates by $1.07 million [5]. - The company admitted that retooling its Salt Lake City facility and a pause in manufacturing impacted Teal 2 sales, leading to a stock price drop of over 25% [5]. Additional Allegations - On January 16, 2025, a report from Kerrisdale Capital claimed that the SRR contract was smaller and less favorable than previously indicated by management, leading to a stock price decline of more than 21% over two trading sessions [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the Class Period from March 18, 2022, to January 15, 2025, seeking damages for misleading statements regarding the company's business and operations [1][7]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, seeking to recover damages for all persons and entities that purchased Red Cat securities during the Class Period [1]. - Investors have until July 22, 2025, to request to be appointed as Lead Plaintiff for the class [2]. Group 2: Company Operations - Red Cat, through its subsidiary Teal Drones, Inc., manufactures drones, including the "Teal 2," designed for military operations [4]. - The Salt Lake City Facility was claimed to have the capacity to produce "thousands of drones per month" or "tens of thousands of drones per year" [5]. Group 3: Contract and Financial Performance - In March 2022, Red Cat was selected by the U.S. Department of Defense to compete in the Short Range Reconnaissance Program, with the contract potentially worth hundreds of millions to over a billion dollars [6][7]. - During a conference call on July 27, 2023, it was revealed that the Salt Lake City Facility could only produce 100 drones per month, contradicting earlier claims [8]. - Following the disclosure of production capacity issues, Red Cat's stock price fell by 8.93% to close at $1.02 per share on July 28, 2023 [9]. - In Q1 2025, Red Cat reported losses per share of $0.17 and revenue of $2.8 million, missing consensus estimates [10]. - On November 19, 2024, Red Cat announced it had won the SRR Contract, with expectations of generating $50 million to $79.5 million in revenue during fiscal year 2025 [12]. Group 4: Allegations of Misleading Information - The lawsuit alleges that Red Cat's executives made materially false and misleading statements regarding the production capacity of the Salt Lake City Facility and the overall value of the SRR Contract [7]. - A report published by Kerrisdale Capital on January 16, 2025, claimed that the SRR Contract was worth only $20 million to $25 million, significantly lower than previously stated [13]. - Following the Kerrisdale Report, Red Cat's stock price fell by 21.54% to close at $8.56 per share on January 17, 2025 [14].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. for alleged violations of securities laws, claiming the company made false and misleading statements regarding its production capacity and contract value, leading to investor losses [1][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The Schall Law Firm has initiated a class action lawsuit against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 [1]. - The lawsuit targets investors who purchased Red Cat's securities between March 18, 2022, and January 15, 2025, encouraging them to contact the firm before July 22, 2025 [2]. - The class has not yet been certified, meaning potential class members are not currently represented by an attorney [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Red Cat - The complaint alleges that Red Cat Holdings overstated the production capacity of its Salt Lake City facility and the value of its Short Range Reconnaissance Program of Record Tranche 2 contract [4]. - These misleading statements are claimed to have caused material misrepresentation throughout the class period, resulting in damages to investors when the truth was revealed [4].

Core Viewpoint - Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims of misleading statements regarding production capacity and contract values [1][3]. Company Overview - Red Cat Holdings, Inc. provides products and solutions to the drone industry, including the "Teal 2" drone designed for military operations [2]. Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit alleges that Red Cat overstated the production capacity of its Salt Lake City facility and the value of its Short Range Reconnaissance Program contract [3]. - On July 27, 2023, Red Cat disclosed that its Salt Lake City facility could only produce 100 drones per month, with potential future capacity of 1,000 drones per month contingent on additional investments [4]. - Following this announcement, Red Cat's stock price fell nearly 9% [4]. Financial Performance - On September 23, 2024, Red Cat reported a loss per share of $0.17, missing consensus estimates by $0.09, and revenue of $2.8 million, missing estimates by $1.07 million [5]. - The company admitted that retooling its Salt Lake City facility impacted Teal 2 sales, leading to a stock price drop of over 25% [5]. Additional Allegations - On January 16, 2025, a report from Kerrisdale Capital claimed that the SRR contract was smaller and less favorable than previously indicated by management, resulting in a stock price decline of over 21% [6]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased Red Cat securities during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, representing the interests of the class [7].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. due to allegations of misleading statements regarding the company's production capacity and contract values, which have led to significant stock price declines for investors [2][4][12]. Group 1: Allegations and Legal Actions - The complaint alleges that Red Cat and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and misleading statements about the production capacity of the Salt Lake City Facility and the overall value of the SRR Contract [4][6]. - Investors who suffered losses from purchasing Red Cat securities between March 18, 2022, and January 15, 2025, are encouraged to discuss their legal rights with Faruqi & Faruqi [1][2]. - A federal securities class action has been filed against Red Cat, with a deadline of July 21, 2025, for investors to seek the role of lead plaintiff [2][14]. Group 2: Company Performance and Stock Impact - Red Cat's stock price fell by $0.10 per share (8.93%) to close at $1.02 on July 28, 2023, following disclosures about the actual production capacity of the Salt Lake City Facility being only 100 drones per month [8][7]. - On September 25, 2024, Red Cat's stock price dropped by $0.80 per share (25.32%) after the company reported losses per share of $0.17 and revenue of $2.8 million, missing consensus estimates [10][9]. - After Kerrisdale Capital published a report on January 16, 2025, alleging that the SRR Contract was worth only $20 million to $25 million, Red Cat's stock price fell by $2.35 per share (21.54%) to close at $8.56 on January 17, 2025 [12][13]. Group 3: Company Background and Initiatives - Red Cat was selected by the U.S. Department of Defense's Defense Innovation Unit to compete in the SRR Program, aimed at providing small, portable sUAS to U.S. Army platoons [5]. - The company has claimed that the SRR Contract could potentially generate hundreds of millions in revenue, with expectations of $50 million to $79.5 million in revenue during fiscal year 2025 [11].

Investors can contact the law firm at no cost to learn more about recovering their losses LOS ANGELES, May 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Portnoy Law Firm advises Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (“Red Cat” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: RCAT) investors that the firm has initiated an investigation into possible securities fraud and may file a class action on behalf of investors. Red Cat investors that lost money on their investment are encouraged to contact Lesley Portnoy, Esq. Investors are encouraged to contact attor ...

SAN DIEGO, May 29, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCAT) securities between March 18, 2022 and January 15, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), have until July 22, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Red Cat class action lawsuit. Captioned Olsen v. Red Cat Holdings, Inc., No. 25-cv-05427 (D.N.J.), the Red Cat class action lawsuit charges Red Cat and certain of Red Cat's t ...

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. for alleged misrepresentations regarding its production capacity and contract value, leading to significant financial harm for investors [1][6]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased Red Cat securities [1]. - The class period for the lawsuit is from March 18, 2022, to January 15, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for July 22, 2025 [6]. Group 2: Allegations and Financial Impact - Allegations include misrepresentations about the production capacity of the Salt Lake City Facility, which was revealed to only produce 100 drones per month instead of the expected 1,000 [6]. - The overall value of the SRR Contract with the U.S. Department of Defense was also misrepresented, with potential revenues claimed to be between $50 million and $79.5 million for FY2025, while estimates were later revised down to $20 million to $25 million [6]. - Significant stock price declines were noted, including an 8.93% drop to $1.02 on July 28, 2023, a 25.32% drop to $2.36 on September 25, 2024, and a 21.54% drop to $8.56 on January 17, 2025, following corrective disclosures [6]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, a law firm with over 125 years of experience in securities litigation, is representing the investors in this case [4]. - The firm emphasizes its commitment to justice for investors who have suffered financial harm due to misrepresented statements [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims of misleading statements regarding production capacity and contract values [1][3]. Company Overview - Red Cat Holdings, Inc. provides products and solutions to the drone industry, including the "Teal 2" drone designed for military operations [2]. Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that Red Cat overstated the production capacity of its Salt Lake City facility and the value of its Short Range Reconnaissance Program contract [3]. - On July 27, 2023, Red Cat disclosed that its Salt Lake City facility could only produce 100 drones per month, with potential future capacity of 1,000 drones per month contingent on additional investments [4]. - Following this announcement, Red Cat's stock price fell nearly 9% [4]. Financial Performance - On September 23, 2024, Red Cat reported a loss per share of $0.17, missing consensus estimates by $0.09, and revenue of $2.8 million, missing estimates by $1.07 million [5]. - The company admitted that retooling its Salt Lake City facility impacted Teal 2 sales, leading to a stock price drop of over 25% [5]. Additional Allegations - On January 16, 2025, a report from Kerrisdale Capital alleged that the SRR contract was smaller and less favorable than previously indicated, causing Red Cat's stock to fall more than 21% over two trading sessions [6]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased Red Cat securities during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, which allows them to act on behalf of other class members [7].