Core Viewpoint - Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims of misleading statements regarding production capacity and contract values during the specified class period [1][3]. Company Overview - Red Cat Holdings, Inc. provides products and solutions to the drone industry, including the "Teal 2" drone designed for military operations [2]. Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit alleges that Red Cat overstated the production capacity of its Salt Lake City facility and the value of its Short Range Reconnaissance Program of Record Tranche 2 contract [3]. - On July 27, 2023, Red Cat disclosed that its Salt Lake City facility could only produce 100 drones per month, with potential future capacity of 1,000 drones per month contingent on additional investments [4]. - Following this announcement, Red Cat's stock price fell nearly 9% [4]. Financial Performance - On September 23, 2024, Red Cat reported a loss per share of $0.17 for Q1 fiscal year 2025, missing consensus estimates by $0.09, and revenue of $2.8 million, missing estimates by $1.07 million [5]. - The company admitted that retooling its Salt Lake City facility impacted Teal 2 sales, leading to a stock price drop of over 25% [5]. Additional Allegations - On January 16, 2025, a report from Kerrisdale Capital claimed that the SRR contract was smaller and less favorable than previously indicated by management, leading to a stock price decline of more than 21% over two trading sessions [6].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Red Cat Holdings, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The Class Period for the Red Cat Holdings, Inc. securities is from March 18, 2022, to January 15, 2025 [1]. - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A lead plaintiff must file a motion with the Court by July 22, 2025, to represent other class members [2]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions [3]. - Rosen Law Firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [3]. - The firm has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Red Cat Holdings made false and misleading statements regarding its production capacity and the value of its contracts, which led to investor damages when the truth was revealed [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding its production capacity and the value of its contracts, particularly the U.S. Army's Short Range Reconnaissance Program [1][2][3] Allegations - The complaint states that Red Cat Holdings overstated the production capacity of its Salt Lake City Facility and the overall value of the SRR Contract [2] - Kerrisdale Capital's report claims the SRR Contract is valued between $20 million and $25 million, contrary to Red Cat's representations [3] - Following the report, Red Cat's stock price dropped by $2.35 per share, or 21.54%, closing at $8.56 on January 17, 2025 [3] Class Action Participation - Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiffs have until July 22, 2025, to apply for this status [4] - Participation in the class action is not required to be eligible for recovery, allowing shareholders to remain absent class members if they choose [4] Company Background - Robbins LLP is noted for its focus on shareholder rights litigation, aiming to help shareholders recover losses and improve corporate governance [5]

Core Viewpoint - Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements regarding its production capacity and the value of its contracts, leading to significant stock price declines during the class period from March 18, 2022, to January 15, 2025 [1][3][4][5][6]. Group 1: Company Operations and Financial Performance - Red Cat Holdings provides products and solutions for the drone industry, including the "Teal 2" drone designed for nighttime military operations [3]. - The company overstated the production capacity of its Salt Lake City facility, claiming it could produce 1,000 drones per month, while it was only capable of producing 100 drones per month at the time of disclosure [4]. - In the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, Red Cat reported a loss of $0.17 per share, missing expectations, and generated $2.8 million in revenue, falling short by $1.07 million [5]. - The company paused manufacturing of the Teal 2 and delayed prototype builds for the U.S. Army, which directly impacted sales [5]. Group 2: Stock Price Impact - Following the disclosure of the actual production capacity on July 27, 2023, Red Cat's stock price fell nearly 9% [4]. - After the disappointing financial results reported on September 23, 2024, the stock declined over 25% [5]. - A report published by Kerrisdale Capital on January 16, 2025, questioned the feasibility of the SRR contract and led to a stock decline of more than 21% over the following two trading sessions [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. for alleged securities fraud affecting investors between March 18, 2022, and January 15, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that the defendants made false statements regarding the production capacity of the Salt Lake City Facility and the value of the U.S. Army's Short Range Reconnaissance Program of Record Tranche 2 contract, leading to materially false and misleading public statements [2]. - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until July 22, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation does not require serving in this role [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders over the past 20 years and consistently ranking among the top securities litigation firms in the U.S. [4].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. due to allegations of misleading statements regarding the company's production capacity and contract values, with a deadline for investors to seek lead plaintiff status in a federal securities class action set for July 21, 2025 [3][5]. Group 1: Allegations and Misleading Statements - The complaint alleges that Red Cat and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and misleading statements about the production capacity of the Salt Lake City Facility and the overall value of the SRR Contract [5][8]. - Defendants suggested that the SRR Contract could generate hundreds of millions to over a billion dollars in revenues, which was later contradicted by actual production capabilities [7][12]. - During a conference call on July 27, 2023, it was revealed that the Salt Lake City Facility could only produce 100 drones per month, contrary to earlier claims of thousands [9]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Stock Impact - Following the disclosure of the actual production capacity, Red Cat's stock price fell by $0.10 per share, or 8.93%, closing at $1.02 on July 28, 2023 [10]. - In the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, Red Cat reported losses per share of $0.17, missing estimates by $0.09, and revenue of $2.8 million, missing estimates by $1.07 million [11]. - After the Kerrisdale Report on January 16, 2025, which alleged that the SRR Contract was worth only $20 million to $25 million, Red Cat's stock price dropped by $2.35 per share, or 21.54%, closing at $8.56 on January 17, 2025 [13][14]. Group 3: Legal and Investor Actions - Investors who suffered losses exceeding $50,000 in Red Cat between March 18, 2022, and January 15, 2025, are encouraged to contact Faruqi & Faruqi to discuss their legal rights [1][3]. - The firm is also seeking information from whistleblowers, former employees, and shareholders regarding Red Cat's conduct [16].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. for alleged securities fraud affecting investors between March 18, 2022, and January 15, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that the defendants made false statements regarding the production capacity of the Salt Lake City Facility and the value of the U.S. Army's Short Range Reconnaissance Program of Record Tranche 2 contract, leading to materially false and misleading public statements [2]. - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until July 22, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff, although participation does not require serving in this role [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders over the past 20 years and consistently ranking among the top securities litigation firms in the U.S. [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Red Cat Holdings, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on July 22, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Red Cat securities between March 18, 2022, and January 15, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by the July 22, 2025 deadline [2]. - The lawsuit alleges that Red Cat made false and misleading statements regarding its production capacity and the value of its contracts, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [4]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest settlement against a Chinese company at the time and being ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 [3]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [3]. - Founding partner Laurence Rosen was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020, and many attorneys at the firm have received accolades from Lawdragon and Super Lawyers [3].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. for alleged securities fraud affecting investors between March 18, 2022, and January 15, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that the defendants made false statements regarding the production capacity of the Salt Lake City Facility and the value of the U.S. Army's Short Range Reconnaissance Program of Record Tranche 2 contract, leading to materially false and misleading public statements [2]. - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until July 22, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff, although participation does not require serving in this role [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders over the past 20 years and consistently ranking among the top securities litigation firms in the U.S. [4].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. due to allegations of misleading statements regarding the company's production capacity and contract values, which have led to significant investor losses [2][4][12]. Group 1: Company Overview - Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCAT) is involved in the production of small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) for military applications, specifically under the U.S. Army's Short Range Reconnaissance Program [5][11]. - The company announced in March 2022 that it was selected to compete in the U.S. Army's SRR Program, which is aimed at providing portable sUAS to Army platoons [5]. Group 2: Allegations and Misleading Statements - The complaint against Red Cat alleges that the company overstated the production capacity of its Salt Lake City facility and the overall value of the SRR Contract, leading to materially false and misleading public statements [4][6]. - During a conference call on July 27, 2023, Red Cat revealed that the Salt Lake City facility could only produce 100 drones per month, contrary to earlier claims of thousands, and that the facility was still under construction [7]. - Following these disclosures, Red Cat's stock price fell by 8.93% to close at $1.02 per share on July 28, 2023 [8]. Group 3: Financial Performance and Stock Impact - In the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, Red Cat reported losses per share of $0.17, missing consensus estimates by $0.09, and revenue of $2.8 million, missing estimates by $1.07 million [9]. - After announcing a pause in manufacturing due to retooling the Salt Lake City facility, Red Cat's stock price dropped by 25.32% over two trading sessions, closing at $2.36 per share on September 25, 2024 [10]. - A report published by Kerrisdale Capital on January 16, 2025, alleged that the SRR Contract was worth only $20 million to $25 million, significantly lower than previously stated, leading to a further stock price decline of 21.54% [12][13]. Group 4: Legal Proceedings - Investors who suffered losses exceeding $50,000 in Red Cat between March 18, 2022, and January 15, 2025, are encouraged to contact Faruqi & Faruqi to discuss their legal options [1][2]. - The deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in the federal securities class action against Red Cat is July 21, 2025 [2].