Core Viewpoint - The StubHub class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives misled investors regarding the financial health of the company during its IPO, leading to significant stock price declines after the release of disappointing financial results [1][3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Salabaj v. StubHub Holdings, Inc., and it charges StubHub and certain executives with violations of the Securities Act of 1933 [1]. - Investors who purchased StubHub common stock during its IPO on September 17, 2025, have until January 23, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [1][2]. - The lawsuit claims that StubHub's IPO offering documents were materially false and misleading, particularly regarding changes in payment timing to vendors that adversely affected free cash flow [3]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Impact - StubHub's IPO involved the issuance of approximately 34 million shares at an offering price of $23.50 per share [2]. - The company reported a free cash flow of negative $4.6 million for Q3 2025, representing a 143% decrease year-over-year, and net cash from operating activities of $3.8 million, a 69.3% decrease [3]. - Following the release of these financial results, StubHub's stock price fell nearly 21%, and by the time the lawsuit commenced, the stock was trading at $10.31 per share, a decline of nearly 56% from the IPO price [3][4]. Group 3: Legal Process and Representation - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased StubHub common stock during the IPO to seek lead plaintiff status in the class action lawsuit [5]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can select a law firm of their choice for litigation [5]. Group 4: About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6]. - The firm has been recognized for its significant recoveries in securities class action cases, including the largest recovery in history of $7.2 billion in the Enron case [6].

NEW YORK, Dec. 23, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in StubHub Holdings, Inc. ("StubHub Holdings, Inc." or the "Company") (NYSE: STUB) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of StubHub Holdings, Inc. investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud. This lawsuit is on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired StubHub common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the registratio ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against StubHub Holdings, Inc. for failing to disclose significant changes affecting its cash flow during its IPO period [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who acquired StubHub securities from September 14, 2025, to November 24, 2025, including shares from the September 2025 IPO [1]. - Investors have until January 23, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representatives [2]. Group 2: Company Operations - StubHub operates a global online marketplace for buying and selling tickets for live sports, music, and entertainment events [2]. Group 3: Allegations - The complaint alleges that StubHub's IPO Registration Statement did not disclose changes in payment timing to vendors, which adversely affected the company's free cash flow [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of shareholders of StubHub Holdings, Inc. due to allegations of misleading statements and undisclosed information affecting the company's financial performance [1][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The lawsuit is aimed at individuals and entities that purchased StubHub common stock during the class period related to the company's September 2025 initial public offering [3]. - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by the deadline of January 23, 2026, to potentially be appointed as lead plaintiffs [5]. Group 2: Allegations Against StubHub - The complaint alleges that StubHub's management issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's financial health [4]. - Specific allegations include changes in the timing of payments to vendors that adversely impacted free cash flow, leading to misleading reports on free cash flow [4]. - The lawsuit claims that positive statements made by the defendants about the company's business and prospects lacked a reasonable basis due to these undisclosed issues [4]. Group 3: Law Firm's Commitment - The Gross Law Firm is recognized for its commitment to protecting investors' rights and ensuring companies adhere to responsible business practices [6]. - The firm aims to recover losses for investors who were affected by the alleged deceit and misleading information from StubHub [6].

Group 1: Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID) - Morgan Stanley analyst Andrew Percoco downgraded Lucid Group from Equal-Weight to Underweight and cut the price target from $30 to $10 [1] - Jim Cramer recommended selling Lucid Group, indicating a negative outlook for the company [1] Group 2: ONEOK (NYSE: OKE) - ONEOK reported third-quarter earnings of $1.49 per share, exceeding the analyst consensus estimate of $1.43 per share [2] - The company also reported quarterly sales of $8.634 billion, surpassing the analyst consensus estimate of $8.530 billion [2] - Jim Cramer recommended buying ONEOK, highlighting its strong performance [1] Group 3: EchoStar Corporation (NASDAQ: SATS) - EchoStar's third-quarter revenue was $3.61 billion, which fell short of estimates of $3.75 billion and decreased from $3.89 billion in the same quarter last year [3] - Jim Cramer recommended selling EchoStar, stating that "the play is over" [2] Group 4: StubHub Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: STUB) - StubHub Holdings is experiencing significant financial losses, leading Jim Cramer to recommend staying away from the stock [3] - Wedbush analyst Scott Devitt maintained a Hold rating on StubHub Holdings and lowered the price target from $22 to $18 [3] Group 5: Price Action - ONEOK shares slipped 0.03% to settle at $71.67 [4] - Lucid Group shares gained 3.2% to close at $11.82 [4] - EchoStar shares rose 1.3% to close at $103.91 [4] - StubHub Holdings, Inc. shares fell 1.6% to settle at $13.77 [4]

Group 1: Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID) - Morgan Stanley analyst Andrew Percoco downgraded Lucid Group from Equal-Weight to Underweight and cut the price target from $30 to $10 [1] - Jim Cramer recommended selling Lucid Group, indicating a negative outlook for the company [1] Group 2: ONEOK (NYSE: OKE) - ONEOK reported third-quarter earnings of $1.49 per share, beating the analyst consensus estimate of $1.43 per share [2] - The company also reported quarterly sales of $8.634 billion, surpassing the analyst consensus estimate of $8.530 billion [2] - Jim Cramer recommended buying ONEOK, highlighting its strong performance [2] Group 3: EchoStar Corporation (NASDAQ: SATS) - EchoStar's third-quarter revenue was $3.61 billion, falling short of estimates of $3.75 billion and down from $3.89 billion in the same quarter last year [3] - Jim Cramer recommended selling EchoStar, stating that "the play is over" [2][3] - Wedbush analyst Scott Devitt maintained a Hold rating on EchoStar and lowered the price target from $22 to $18 [3] Group 4: StubHub Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: STUB) - StubHub is experiencing significant financial losses, leading Jim Cramer to recommend staying away from the stock [3] - Wedbush analyst Scott Devitt maintained a Hold rating on StubHub Holdings and lowered the price target from $22 to $18 [3] Group 5: Price Action - ONEOK shares slipped 0.03% to settle at $71.67 [4] - Lucid Group shares gained 3.2% to close at $11.82 [4] - EchoStar shares rose 1.3% to close at $103.91 [4] - StubHub Holdings, Inc. shares fell 1.6% to settle at $13.77 [4]

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against StubHub Holdings, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements in its Offering Documents related to its September 2025 initial public offering [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations Against StubHub - The lawsuit claims that StubHub failed to disclose significant changes in the timing of payments to vendors, which adversely affected its free cash flow [2]. - It is alleged that these undisclosed changes resulted in materially misleading reports regarding StubHub's free cash flow for the trailing 12 months [2]. - The complaint asserts that the positive statements made by StubHub about its business operations and prospects were materially false and lacked a reasonable basis due to the undisclosed issues [2]. Group 2: Lead Plaintiff Process - Investors in StubHub have until January 23, 2026, to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff representative in the class action [3]. - A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all class members and is typically the investor or group of investors with the largest financial interest [3]. - The decision to serve as a lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery from the lawsuit [3]. Group 3: Law Firm Information - Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP is a prominent U.S. law firm specializing in securities-fraud class actions and investor protection [4]. - The firm has a history of leading significant recoveries in securities litigation and has received multiple accolades for its work [4].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against StubHub Holdings, Inc. due to concerns regarding the company's practices and disclosures [1] Company Overview - StubHub Holdings, Inc. is listed on the NYSE under the ticker STUB [1] - The company is under scrutiny from a leading national securities law firm, which has a history of recovering significant amounts for investors [1] Legal Investigation - The investigation by Faruqi & Faruqi focuses on potential claims that may arise from StubHub's operations [1] - The firm has been active in securities law since its founding in 1995 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [1]

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against StubHub Holdings, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements in its Offering Documents related to its September 2025 initial public offering [1]. Group 1: Allegations Against StubHub - The lawsuit claims that StubHub failed to disclose significant changes in the timing of payments to vendors, which adversely affected its free cash flow [3]. - It is alleged that these undisclosed changes rendered StubHub's free cash flow reports materially misleading [3]. - The complaint asserts that the positive statements made by StubHub regarding its business operations and prospects were materially false and lacked a reasonable basis due to the undisclosed issues [3]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses from StubHub can seek to be appointed as lead plaintiffs by January 23, 2026, or may choose to remain absent class members [4]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and select counsel to direct the litigation [4]. - Participation as a lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery from the lawsuit [4]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP is a prominent U.S. law firm specializing in securities-fraud class actions and investor protection [5]. - The firm has a history of leading significant recoveries in securities litigation and has received numerous accolades for its work [5].

Core Viewpoint - The StubHub class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives misled investors regarding its financial health during the IPO process, leading to significant stock price declines after the release of disappointing financial results [1][3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - Purchasers of StubHub common stock from its September 17, 2025 IPO have until January 23, 2026, to seek lead plaintiff status in the class action lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit, Salabaj v. StubHub Holdings, Inc., claims violations of the Securities Act of 1933 by StubHub and its executives [1][2]. - StubHub's IPO involved the issuance of approximately 34 million shares at an offering price of $23.50 per share [2]. Group 2: Allegations Against StubHub - The lawsuit alleges that the IPO offering documents were materially false or misleading, particularly regarding changes in vendor payment timing that adversely affected free cash flow [3]. - StubHub reported a free cash flow of negative $4.6 million for Q3 2025, representing a 143% decrease year-over-year, and a 69.3% decrease in net cash from operating activities [3]. - Following the release of these financial results, StubHub's stock price fell nearly 21% [3]. Group 3: Stock Price Impact - By the time the class action lawsuit commenced, StubHub's stock price had dropped to as low as $10.31 per share, a nearly 56% decline from the IPO price of $23.50 [4]. Group 4: Legal Process for Lead Plaintiff - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased StubHub common stock during the IPO to seek lead plaintiff status, which involves directing the class action lawsuit on behalf of all class members [5]. - The lead plaintiff can choose a law firm to represent the class, and participation as lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any potential recovery [5]. Group 5: About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6]. - The firm has been recognized for its significant recoveries in securities class action cases, including the largest recovery in history of $7.2 billion in the Enron case [6].