教材不该二次收费

Core Viewpoints - The core viewpoint of the article is that publishers should balance the protection of copyright with the reasonable use rights of readers, especially in the context of educational materials, and should not prioritize profit over the accessibility of knowledge for students [1][2] Publisher Practices - A professor from East China University of Political Science and Law highlighted the issue of fee-based QR codes in legal textbooks, specifically mentioning 46 QR codes in the "Constitutional Law" textbook published by Higher Education Press, each costing 3 yuan, totaling 138 yuan [2] - The editor of the textbook clarified that the "extended reading" resources are free for new book users by entering the anti-counterfeiting code on the back cover, and the QR codes are intended to prevent piracy [2] Public Reaction - The practice of setting up fee-based QR codes in textbooks has sparked widespread attention and criticism, with many netizens finding it difficult to understand and criticizing the publishers for being overly profit-driven [2] Legal and Ethical Considerations - While copyright protection is essential, the method of using fee-based QR codes in textbooks is questionable, especially given the public welfare nature of educational materials [2] - Textbooks have a strong public welfare and inclusive nature, and many students rely on second-hand books or borrowed materials, which could be hindered by such practices [2] Publisher Responsibility - Publishers should adopt a more public welfare-oriented approach when setting up QR codes, focusing on preventing piracy and verifying authenticity rather than using them as a means to generate revenue and restrict students' access to knowledge [1][2]