Core Insights - A report indicates that Starbucks Coffee Trading Company (SCTC), a subsidiary in Switzerland, has significantly influenced Starbucks' tax payments over the past decade, helping to shift approximately 1.3billioninprofitstolower−taxjurisdictionssince2015[2][10]−ThereporthighlightsacontrastbetweenStarbucks′publicimageofsocialresponsibilityanditsuseoftaxstrategiesthatexploitloopholes[3][10]TaxStrategyandFinancialPractices−SCTCisresponsibleforsourcingunroastedcoffeeandhasbeenusedtobookthecostsofthesebeans,whichdonotphysicallypassthroughSwitzerland,allowingStarbuckstomarkuppricessignificantly[4][5]−Themarkuponcoffeebeansincreasedfromabout3125 million and $150 million in dividends annually to another subsidiary, Starbucks Coffee EMEA B.V., with these payments not being taxed upon leaving Switzerland or entering the Netherlands [7] - The report analyzed financial filings of Starbucks subsidiaries across Europe to trace profits booked at SCTC [7] Company Response and Industry Context - Starbucks responded to the report by asserting that it pays appropriate taxes in all jurisdictions and that the report misrepresents its business model [8] - The use of offshore tax strategies is not unique to Starbucks, as many large companies utilize tax havens to minimize tax obligations, a practice that has been ongoing for decades [11][12]