From IBM to OpenAI: 50 years of winning (and failed) strategies at Microsoft

Core Insights - Microsoft celebrates its 50th anniversary, marking its evolution from a small computer company to one of the world's most powerful corporations, with a net profit of $88 billion from sales of $245 billion in 2024 and a market value close to $3,000 billion [1][2] Group 1: Historical Development - Microsoft was founded in 1975 by Bill Gates and Paul Allen in Albuquerque, New Mexico, initially focusing on programming languages [2] - The first significant era involved a partnership with IBM, where Microsoft provided the operating system MS-DOS, leading to substantial profits and market presence [3][5][7] - The second era was characterized by the launch of Windows, which transformed user experience with a graphical interface, culminating in Windows 95, which held over 70% market share in operating systems [9][10] Group 2: Challenges and Internal Conflicts - The mid-1990s brought challenges as Microsoft struggled to adapt to the internet era, leading to legal issues and competition from new browsers like Google Chrome [12] - Under CEO Steve Ballmer, Microsoft attempted diversification into various sectors, with mixed results; successful ventures included Azure and Xbox, while failures included Windows Phone and Zune [13][14] - Internal conflicts and bureaucratization hindered innovation, leading to criticism of products like Internet Explorer 6 and Windows Vista [15][16] Group 3: Recent Developments and Future Outlook - In 2014, Satya Nadella took over as CEO, shifting the focus to cloud services, with Azure becoming the second-largest cloud service provider by 2024, contributing over 56% of Microsoft's revenue [17] - Significant acquisitions included LinkedIn for $26.2 billion and GitHub for $7.5 billion, alongside a $14 billion investment in OpenAI, positioning Microsoft favorably in the AI sector [18] - Microsoft's evolution reflects a series of strategic moves and adaptations, raising questions about its future sustainability and relevance in the tech landscape [19]