Workflow
9家上市行“反向追薪”超1.13亿!渤海银行人均退薪3.93万,招商银行未再披露
600036CM BANK(600036) 新浪财经·2025-04-03 00:23

Core Viewpoint - The 2024 annual reports of listed banks reveal significant performance salary clawbacks, with a total amount exceeding 113 million yuan across nine banks, indicating a growing trend in enforcing accountability in executive compensation [1][4]. Summary by Category Performance Salary Clawbacks - Nine listed banks have disclosed their performance salary clawback situations in their 2024 annual reports, including major banks like Bank of China, Zhejiang Commercial Bank, and Bohai Bank [1][4]. - The total amount of clawbacks reported by these banks exceeds 113 million yuan, with Bank of China leading at 32.5 million yuan [1][4]. - The average clawback amount per person was highest at Bohai Bank, reaching 39,264.71 yuan, while Bank of China and Harbin Bank also reported significant average clawbacks exceeding 10,000 yuan [2][4]. Year-on-Year Comparison - Compared to 2023, several banks, including China Merchants Bank and Weihai Bank, did not disclose specific clawback amounts for 2024, despite having reported significant figures in the previous year [6]. - In 2023, China Merchants Bank had the highest clawback amount at 43.29 million yuan, affecting 4,415 employees with an average clawback of approximately 9,805 yuan [6]. Disclosure Trends - Zhejiang Commercial Bank and Zhongyuan Bank disclosed specific clawback amounts for the first time in 2024, indicating an improvement in transparency [7]. - Bohai Bank and Dongguan Rural Commercial Bank have consistently disclosed their clawback amounts for three consecutive years, showing a commitment to accountability [5][6]. Regulatory Context - The regulatory framework for performance salary clawbacks has been strengthened over the years, with guidelines established by the former China Banking Regulatory Commission and the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission [10][11]. - As of 2023, over 95% of banking institutions have implemented performance salary clawback mechanisms, reflecting a significant shift towards more robust governance in the banking sector [11].