特朗普发最后通牒：中国须立即取消反制，中方简洁回应，全球见证战略角逐

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the implications of Trump's tariff policies, which are seen as a double-edged sword that may exacerbate existing economic issues in the U.S. rather than resolve them [1][3][10] - Trump's "reciprocal tariffs" are intended as a tool for "America First," but the fundamental economic principles remain unchanged, leading to potential negative consequences for the U.S. economy [2][4] - The agricultural and manufacturing sectors in the U.S. are particularly affected, facing rising costs and decreased competitiveness due to the tariffs [2][4] Group 2 - There is significant internal dissent within the U.S. regarding Trump's tariff policies, with even members of his cabinet expressing doubts and considering resignation [4][6] - The tariffs impose an invisible tax burden on American consumers, who end up paying higher prices for everyday goods, contradicting the intended protective measures for American citizens [4][6] - Protests against the tariff policies have erupted across the U.S., indicating widespread public dissatisfaction and unrest [6] Group 3 - Trump's approach to trade negotiations, including the intention to isolate China, reflects a strategy of power politics that may undermine America's international standing and alienate allies [7][12] - China's response emphasizes respect, dialogue, and cooperation as effective means to resolve differences, countering Trump's aggressive tactics [9][12] - The ongoing trade conflict is characterized as a test of economic strength, strategic wisdom, and political endurance, with uncertain outcomes for both the U.S. and China [10][12]