Mark Zuckerberg Takes Stand In Meta Antitrust Trial

Core Argument - CEO Mark Zuckerberg defended Meta against the FTC's claims of being an anti-competitive monopoly during the antitrust trial [1] Group 1: Testimony and Defense - Zuckerberg emphasized that Facebook's user interest has shifted from friend connections to a broader discovery of global events, indicating that the platform has evolved into a "discovery engine" [3] - The FTC's attorney argued that Facebook's core value proposition remains family and friend connections, which is crucial for establishing a monopoly claim [2][4] - Zuckerberg acknowledged concerns about Facebook's "cultural relevance" and discussed potential strategic changes, including a radical idea to reset friend connections for users [4] Group 2: Competition Landscape - Meta's legal team contended that the company competes in a much larger arena beyond just friend and family news feeds, including short-form videos and messaging services [3] - The FTC's attorney highlighted the messaging new users receive, which encourages them to connect with friends and family, reinforcing the argument of Facebook's monopoly in that segment [4]