Bank of America to Pay $540.3 Million After Ruling in FDIC Lawsuit

Core Viewpoint - Bank of America is set to pay $540.3 million following a judge's ruling in a lawsuit initiated by the FDIC regarding underpayment for deposit insurance [1] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The FDIC sued Bank of America for$1.12 billion in 2017, claiming the bank did not comply with a 2011 rule that altered how banks report risk exposure, leading to reduced deposit insurance contributions [2] - The judge ruled against Bank of America's argument that the FDIC's rule lacked a reasonable basis, stating that the FDIC was not obligated to create a "perfect measure" for predicting banks' potential losses [3] - The judge determined that the FDIC's lawsuit was filed too late to claim amounts prior to the second quarter of 2013, resulting in the ordered payment covering assessments from Q2 2013 to the end of 2014 [3] Group 2: Bank of America's Response - A spokesperson for Bank of America expressed satisfaction with the judge's ruling and noted that the bank has reserves in place reflecting this decision [4] Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The FDIC's new acting chairman, Travis Hill, announced plans for a comprehensive review of regulations and a more open-minded approach to innovation and technology, including FinTech partnerships and digital assets [5] - The FDIC has recently updated its guidance, allowing FDIC-supervised institutions to engage in crypto-related activities without prior approval, provided they manage associated risks effectively [6]