《宝可梦》在华维权首案审理始末

Core Viewpoint - The case of "Pokémon" represents a significant example of how judicial wisdom can contribute to building an open, inclusive, and mutually beneficial global innovation ecosystem through effective resolution of intellectual property disputes [10][12]. Group 1: Case Background - The Pokémon Company initiated a lawsuit against a company for copyright infringement related to the mobile game "Pocket Monster: Reproduction," which closely mirrored the original Pokémon series [2][3]. - The mobile game generated over 300 million RMB in revenue within a year of its launch, highlighting its popularity and the extent of the infringement [2]. - The initial ruling by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court ordered the infringing companies to pay 107 million RMB in damages, which led to an appeal by the defendants [3]. Group 2: Judicial Process - The Guangdong High Court conducted a public hearing for the appeal, attended by various stakeholders, indicating the case's significance [4]. - The court engaged in extensive evidence review and discussions to address the substantial disagreements between the parties regarding the facts and legal interpretations [5]. - The court's approach included a combination of strict examination, demonstration judgments, and international mediation to facilitate a resolution [8]. Group 3: Resolution and Impact - The mediation process resulted in the infringing companies agreeing to cease their infringing activities, publicly apologize, and compensate the Pokémon Company, demonstrating a commitment to rectify their actions [9][12]. - The case has set a precedent for future intellectual property disputes in the gaming industry, emphasizing the importance of protecting innovation and fostering a fair competitive environment [13]. - The Guangdong High Court's handling of the case reflects a broader commitment to enhancing the judicial environment for foreign investment and innovation in China [11][12].