Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around former President Trump's assertion that U.S. military and commercial vessels should be allowed free passage through the Panama and Suez Canals, claiming that these waterways would not exist without the U.S. [1][2] - Trump's comments challenge the existing international shipping order and the sovereignty of the nations that control these canals, particularly Panama and Egypt [1][2][3] - The Panama Canal is crucial for U.S. container shipping, handling approximately 40% of the U.S. container transport volume [2] - The Suez Canal is a vital trade route, carrying 12% to 15% of global trade annually, and is frequently used by U.S. Navy vessels [3] Group 2 - The Panama Canal has been under Panamanian control since December 31, 1999, following treaties signed in 1977, which included the withdrawal of U.S. military presence from the canal zone [2] - Trump's previous statements have indicated a desire to "reclaim" the Panama Canal, even suggesting the potential use of military force to do so, citing its importance to "economic security" [2] - The Suez Canal's revenue dropped by 60% last year due to regional conflicts, resulting in a loss of approximately $7 billion [3]
美国船只应该免费通航!特朗普“再放厥词”:没有美国,巴拿马和苏伊士运河就不会存在
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen·2025-04-27 02:01