Group 1 - Trump's abrupt shift in strategy towards China and Russia reflects a significant change in U.S. foreign policy, moving from aggressive posturing to a more conciliatory approach [1][25] - The U.S. trade war with China has escalated tariffs from 54% to 245%, leading to warnings from U.S. retailers about potential job losses, indicating a self-destructive economic impact [4][18] - Internal divisions within the U.S. administration are evident, with moderate officials urging Trump to ease tariffs, highlighting a lack of consensus on trade policy [6][23] Group 2 - Russia's strategic patience contrasts sharply with the U.S.'s erratic approach, as Putin uses temporary ceasefires to test reactions and strengthen Russia's negotiating position [9][11] - The U.S. has shown inconsistency in its support for Ukraine, with Trump suggesting that restoring Ukraine's borders to pre-2014 status is unrealistic, which may lead to a loss of U.S. support for Ukraine [16][18] - China's response to U.S. tariffs has been characterized by strategic resilience, with a focus on building global alliances and enhancing domestic economic capabilities, which may ultimately benefit China in the long run [21][23]
特朗普对中俄策略急转直下,美股暴跌,泽连斯基政府宁战败不妥协
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-04-27 04:15