“网红儿童”带来的未保难题如何解？先从家庭开始“画”个圆

Core Viewpoint - The phenomenon of "internet celebrity children" raises concerns about the protection of minors' rights in the context of excessive commercialization and the impact of digital platforms on their lives [1][2][3] Group 1: Impact of "Internet Celebrity Children" - The commercialization of "internet celebrity children" can lead to distorted parent-child relationships, affect children's physical and mental health, and pose risks of information leakage [1][3] - Experts emphasize that while "internet celebrity children" can bring opportunities for value realization and family wealth growth, the potential negative impacts should not be overlooked [1][3] - The phenomenon is driven by a combination of societal digitalization and the low barriers to content production, allowing both minors and adults to gain fame quickly [2][3] Group 2: Risks and Concerns - The "internet celebrity children" industry is characterized by adults exploiting children as cash cows, leading to potential harm to the children's well-being [2][3] - High-intensity filming can physically harm children, and exposure to online violence can distort their psychology [3][4] - The lack of clear standards for defining "internet celebrity children" accounts complicates the regulation of this phenomenon [5][6] Group 3: Protection Measures - Experts advocate for a concentric circle model for protecting children's rights, with families as the first line of defense, followed by schools, platforms, and society [6][7] - Parents are encouraged to enhance their media literacy and engage with their children in navigating the digital landscape [7][8] - Platforms are urged to utilize their advantages to produce educational content and monitor potentially harmful tags, while also establishing a blacklist for problematic accounts [8][9] Group 4: Regulatory Framework - Current laws provide a foundation for protecting minors' rights, but there is a need for more specific regulations regarding "internet celebrity children" [9] - Suggestions include age-based governance, where younger children are prohibited from participating in marketing-related content, while older children have varying degrees of consent rights [9]