Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the potential reduction of tariffs on China by the Trump administration, which may exceed 50%, contingent on China's response to U.S. tariffs [1] - The trade war initiated by the U.S. is emphasized, with a call for dialogue based on equality and mutual respect [1] - Analysts suggest that any tariff reduction would be largely symbolic and unlikely to change the fundamental trade dynamics between the U.S. and China [3] Group 2 - Trump's consideration to lower tariffs is seen as a strategy to boost the U.S. stock market and appease key supporters in agriculture and automotive sectors [3] - The U.S. government faces significant pressure, with rising consumer prices and potential supply chain issues highlighted by retail giants like Walmart [3] - Trump's need to maintain a favorable public image and demonstrate success in negotiations is noted as a driving factor behind the tariff discussions [5] Group 3 - The U.S. Treasury Secretary has acknowledged the unsustainability of the trade war, indicating a need for both nations to find ways to ease tensions [5] - A comprehensive restructuring plan for the U.S. State Department is underway, aiming to implement Trump's "America First" policy, which includes a 15% reduction in staff and the elimination of 132 offices [5][7] - The restructuring has received mixed reactions domestically, with Republican support and Democratic criticism regarding its potential impact on U.S. global influence [7]
真被中方等到?特朗普将下调对华关税,美国务院重组,信号很特殊
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-04-28 11:48