建议五一拿身份证消费就减免25%，网民又能骂专家了

Core Viewpoint - The suggestion by Li Daokui to stimulate consumption through a government subsidy of 25% for purchases made with an ID has sparked significant public backlash, with many netizens criticizing the practicality and implications of such a proposal [1][3][6]. Group 1: Public Reaction - Netizens have ridiculed Li Daokui's suggestion, questioning its economic validity and practicality, with some suggesting that it may inadvertently benefit the wealthy more than the poor [3][4][7]. - The public discourse reflects a broader frustration with expert opinions, as many feel that the suggestions do not align with the realities of consumer behavior and economic conditions [6][7]. Group 2: Economic Implications - The proposal to provide a 25% subsidy is seen as lacking a solid economic foundation, with critics arguing that fiscal responsibility must be prioritized over direct consumer subsidies [3][4]. - There is a sentiment among the public that before discussing consumption incentives, broader economic stability and equitable distribution of wealth should be addressed [4][7]. Group 3: Expert vs. Public Opinion - The ongoing debate highlights a disconnect between expert recommendations and public sentiment, with netizens expressing a desire for more actionable and realistic economic solutions [6][7]. - The phenomenon of mocking experts reflects a deeper societal desire for empowerment and a more significant role in economic decision-making [6][7].