美乌矿产协议，特朗普“交易外交”为何难奏效？

Core Points - Ukraine has effectively maintained its national security and development interests during negotiations, securing several advantageous terms [1][9]. Group 1: Negotiation Outcomes - The agreement signed between Ukraine and the U.S. establishes a "Reconstruction Investment Fund," which is also referred to as the "mineral agreement" [3][4]. - The agreement ensures that all ownership and control of minerals remain with Ukraine, and the fund will be managed equally by both parties [9]. - The agreement does not mention Ukraine's debt obligations to the U.S., allowing profits to be prioritized for Ukraine's defense against Russia and domestic economic recovery [9]. Group 2: Diplomatic Strategy - Ukraine has demonstrated strong domestic unity and support for President Zelensky, which has bolstered its negotiating position [9][10]. - The country has successfully rallied support from the EU and other Western nations, receiving military aid and intelligence support, which has reduced its reliance on U.S. assistance [10][11]. - The successful negotiation outcomes signal reliability for long-term cooperation with Ukraine, aligning with its constitutional and European integration processes [9]. Group 3: U.S. Diplomatic Approach - The Trump administration's approach to negotiations has shifted from generous aid to seeking tangible economic returns from Ukraine's mineral resources [5][6]. - The aggressive negotiation style of the Trump administration, characterized by extreme pressure tactics, has been evident in the discussions with Ukraine [6][7]. - Despite the U.S. exerting pressure, Ukraine has shown resilience and has not succumbed to signing unfavorable agreements [8][11].